Communism

1668 readers
45 users here now

Welcome to the communist Lemmy community! This is a community for all Marxist.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
451
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/3983568

From Xi Jinping:

Second, we must accelerate the transition to a green and low-carbon development model

Upholding green and low-carbon development as a fundamental approach to resolving environmental problems, we will work faster to promote eco-friendly ways of production and life, and lay a green foundation for high-quality development.


Check it out and let me know what you think of Xi Jinping's speech.

452
46
Protestation (discuss.tchncs.de)
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 
453
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/3976313

The author of this article wrote a book against people owning homes.

Literally owning homes.

Anyway, "YourCommieDad" takes the guy down a peg.

P. S.: To be clear, this video is a rebuttal to an article from a website called Real Clear Markets.

Like I said in the last one:

Like

Share

Subscribe

Comment

etc.

to help with the algorithm.

Thanks!

454
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/3976083

Link: https://www.liberationnews.org/transitional-council-scheme-is-a-u-s-plot-to-subvert-haitis-independence/

Please:

Like

Share

Subscribe

Comment

Etc.

to help with the algorithm for this person; I'm trying to help 'em out.

455
159
Protestation (discuss.tchncs.de)
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 
456
 
 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/2066954

From the rest of the headline:


(...) ("Independence Restoration Day"). They chanted "Lithuania for Lithuanians only", "Lithuania without Russians" etc.


Things are getting dire. I have a friend in Lithuania and he says they are, though this has been going on for a while...

457
 
 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/2063507

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/2063506

Let's bring it.

458
 
 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/2059933

Quote:


Kotick is also looking for partners, which could include OpenAI CEO Sam Altman


Oh God NO

459
278
Protestation (discuss.tchncs.de)
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 
460
53
Protestation (discuss.tchncs.de)
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 
461
179
Protestation (discuss.tchncs.de)
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 
462
 
 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/2046445

Subscribe to this person.

Trying to help 'em out.

Also, comment and like (you know, for the algorithm).

Cheers!

463
172
Protestation (discuss.tchncs.de)
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 
464
4
Protestation (discuss.tchncs.de)
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 
465
 
 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/2040520

I quite liked it!

It felt like I was watching a great biopic and I liked some of the cinematography as well and the way they shot certain things.

But also, it felt a bit like a Guy Ritchie film with the film constantly cutting back and forth between different eras... which I sort-of liked but I can understand why others didn't like it and it has its limitations (not to mention: it's hard to do effectively).

The problem is that, unless you're a communist or a history buff, you won't always understand the references. There's a lot missing, even for a film that's 3 hours long. I don't mind the 3 hour duration. But people talked vaguely about shit or were kinda obscure with what they said. I will say that it captures the Cold War and Second Red Scare aspect well. But you won't, say, care who Stimson is unless you already know who Stimson is, so to speak.

I'm surprised that the communists are described and shown to be, more or less, sympathetic. Oppie says something about "appeasing the Soviets" but that's probably just fluff and we all know that he doesn't mean it (plus, he was likely a Communist Party USA member at one point anyway so, in a way, it doesn't matter what anti-communist thing he might say here and there because we know that it's bullshit). Does the audience know that? They probably sort-of do. I say "sort-of" because no doubt it'll go over other peoples' heads.

It definitely feels like Christopher Nolan made it... for himself, so to speak, in the way it just glosses over things that the audience could've probably got a primer on to begin with. Like, I felt like the director and the people behind the film really liked the subject matter but they still had to dumb it down in the end. They still had to do it all fast within a 3 hour framework.

It's amazing that none of the other characters besides, say, Teller (for example) have personalities. Well, certainly, Groves has a personality, Jean has a personality, but you can tell that, for example, Lomanwitz doesn't have much of a personality to begin with. Whatever his historical significance, the movie will gloss over it at times, and you can tell that, even when the movie references things from an hour previously (it is a bit tightly written), it's not... able to do so in a way that's always significant. I see what Nolan was trying to do by revisiting certain scenes and seeing it from a different angle. I like it. But it doesn't always work.

I understand that most MLs will hate this film. I've seen many that do.

But I went in not expecting that much in terms of accuracy and was pleasantly surprised by, well, other aspects of the film, including the Second Red Scare aspect.

Also, Kitty saying that she sees a difference between communism and Soviet communism was honestly a good answer. I liked it, but again, that's a theoretical debate that MLs sometimes have all the time (I don't believe that the Soviet model is the only model of socialism). I don't know. I just liked it. You can glean things from the dialogue of the movie... if you fill in the dots with what you already know (and use sub-titles all the while).

On another note: I don't mind "no-personality" characters per se (I've read A Song of Ice and Fire, for crying out loud, and I like it, but I'm doing a re-read and there are certainly third-party characters that come off as basically being there to enliven the scene, act as a go-between for certain characters, or expand the world). As bonkers as it might sound, I don't think every character (not even a secondary character) has to have an expanded backstory and personality so long as they're there to explain things and support the secondary characters or main characters... To give an A Song of Ice and Fire example, Robett Glover (a character from the books, not Game of Thrones) isn't going to be on the same level as, say, Jon Snow or Davos Seaworth. And I get that. But sometimes, it seems that even the secondary characters in the film Oppenheimer could've used a bit more oomph, a bit more presence, a bit more of the it quality (and, hell, sometimes the main characters too).

Again, interesting ideas.

Interesting way of doing things with the film.

But obviously, the film can't get a high score in all the things it's trying to do.

466
 
 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/2039938

It's a long-form article so here's an excerpt of the first part:


Baltimore is often maligned as a shrinking city beset by crime and intractable poverty. But take a walk down President Street just south of Little Italy on a Friday night, and you will enter a world that appears far removed from the idea of a city that is terminally in decay.

Past the empty pavilions of the Inner Harbor and east of the city’s increasingly troubled downtown business district, a cluster of towering high-rises emerges from the harbor like a defiant mountain range of concrete.

A cobblestone boulevard leads to a European-style thoroughfare dotted with a dazzling array of upscale restaurants and outdoor dining patios. Lines of traffic spill onto the side streets as eager tourists vie for hard-to-find parking spots.

The outdoor bars and retail shops thrum with activity while the upscale Four Seasons Hotel sits astride panoramic views of the tranquil harbor. Stories of luxury condominiums extend into a swanky dance club, which perches atop the building like a palatial penthouse. An express elevator operated by a top hat-wearing attendant delivers partygoers to an often-packed dance floor.

It’s a world unto itself, seemingly far removed from the David Simon-conjured Wire-fied landscape of a failed city beset by corruption, drug dealing, and over policing: An upscale bubble that offers a gleaming rebuke to the naysayers who deem Baltimore a dysfunctional city of a dwindling population and violent crime.

But it’s a success story that comes with a hefty, less obviously apparent, asterisk. Harbor East is, in some sense, a taxpayer-bolstered paradise.

Based on the findings of our nearly year-long investigation into how Harbor East came to be, this shining city within the city is a success story heavily dependent upon public subsidies to an extent that has not previously been reported. It is a waterfront oasis fueled by dozens of tax breaks and incentives, built and sustained by tens of millions of dollars in city money.

How these tax subsidies have both defined and transformed Harbor East is a story entangled in the city that surrounds it. As our ongoing investigation Tax Broke has revealed, it is a tale of how a community walled off from its affluent suburban neighbors turned to tax incentives to reverse years of decay and population loss. But it’s also an example of the secrecy that obscures the details of how much this policy costs and who it really benefits.

As this spreadsheet illustrates, records obtained by TRNN reveal that, between 2012 and 2022, Harbor East received roughly $115.8 million in tax relief from the city through various subsidies and incentives.

However, despite numerous Maryland Public Information Act requests, city officials would release only a limited range of data from 2013–2022 pertaining to Harbor East tax records. They also would not release separate tax bills regarding a series of PILOTs—payment in lieu of taxes—granted to buildings within the development, which led to additional tax savings for developers.

Still, what we were able to obtain paints a picture of a luxury development built upon a foundation of public subsidies.

The most lucrative of these incentives went to the Marriott Waterfront Hotel. To date, $57 million in property tax has been abated, part of a 25-year PILOT that requires a tax payment of $1 per year.

But the city has also granted tax relief to a variety of other buildings.

Roughly 75% of the additional Harbor East properties garnered subsidies worth approximately $58 million in just under a decade. The bulk of the tax breaks were PILOTs, given to at least seven properties comprising the waterfront development.

PILOTs offer fairly straightforward tax relief: Property taxes are phased in over time on a sliding scale, from a small percentage of the actual tax bill to a greater share of what would actually be owed. A ten-year PILOT, for example, might require the property to pay 5% of the entire tax bill for the first three years, then 20% for the next four, and, finally, 80% for the remaining two. But the city has been opaque about the tax savings from individual PILOTs, removing the data from online tax records and ignoring our requests for additional data.

But some properties were granted more than one tax break.

The pricey office tower built to house the Legg Mason investment firm benefited from both an Enterprise Zone credit and a PILOT. The subsidies were intended to maintain 600 jobs and keep the firm’s headquarters in the city.

Legg Mason was acquired by California-based investment firm Franklin Templeton in 2020. The name is currently off the building, but the subsidies remain. Records show the owners of the building have not been required to pay full city property tax since 2018.

In addition to the PILOTs, multiple other buildings within the same development also received Enterprise Zone tax credits and abatements under the Brownfields incentive program. Each forgives a percentage of property taxes ranging from 50% to 75% of the entire tax bill for five to ten years, depending on a variety of criteria.

The Enterprise Zone credit is designed to spur commercial development in poor neighborhoods but was expanded over time to include the entire city. The Brownfields credit incentivizes developers to remediate contaminated properties and offers a similarly generous 75% reduction in tax bills for five to ten years.

The Four Seasons Hotel and Private Residences used a Brownfield credit to save roughly $10.6 million in taxes over the past decade. This incentive included nearly $6 million for the luxury condos that sit atop the hotel.

The $115 million figure does not paint a full picture of the taxpayer tab for Harbor East. The scope of our calculations is limited by the fact that many of the tax credits granted to these developments were in effect prior to 2013—records that were not available, according to city finance officials.

The lack of transparency is, in part, due to how the city bills properties that receive tax subsidies.

Special credits like Brownfields and Enterprise Zones are not detailed online. Instead, we had to ask the city for copies of the separate paper bills it mails annually to developers, which list the value of the credit. From the paper bills, we calculated the 10-year figure for taxes abated through Brownfields and Enterprise Zone tax credits that contribute to the $115 million taxpayer tab.

Even the taxes abated via PILOTs were challenging to calculate. The city told us tax bills for PILOTs are mailed separately from ordinary tax bills, including special credits. We asked for copies of the separate PILOT bills, but the city would not release them, again without explanation or response to our request.

To work around the lack of data, we obtained two decades’ worth of property assessments for all the parcels that comprise Harbor East. We used the value of the buildings to calculate the property taxes owed in any given year. Then, we applied the formulas outlined in council legislation, which authorized several of the Harbor East PILOTs to estimate the tax savings for a given PILOT to arrive at the approximate figure.


Anyone else live in Baltimore or Maryland?

What do you think of all this?

467
5
Protestation (discuss.tchncs.de)
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 
468
 
 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/2035745

Quite surprising. Here's an excerpt from the interview:


As always, we appreciate your support in whatever form it takes. Now over 50 million freelancers participate in the gig economy in the United States, and in 2023 it was projected to generate $455 billion. Many freelance workers work white collar freelance contracts across a number of industries, most notably tech, media and other creative industries. According to one survey, over 50% of gig workers reported to have experienced wage theft at least once in their freelance career. And due to the nature of contingent gig work, it can be difficult to compel employers to pay their freelancers once the project has been completed. Oftentimes, freelancers are left in a lurch after working for weeks or months on a contract and to find themselves unable to reach employers who owe them payment sometimes to the tune of thousands of dollars. That’s where freelance isn’t free, comes in legislation aimed at protecting freelancers from nonpayment by unruly employers First passed in New York City in 2017.

Freelance isn’t Free. Legislation has helped freelancers recoup hundreds of thousands of dollars in unpaid invoices over the last seven years. Now backed by organizers at the National Writers Union and the Freelance Solidarity Project. Local and state governments are looking to enact their own freelance Isn’t Free Laws with me today to discuss all this are Eric Thurm and Keisha Dutes. Keisha TK Dutes is an audio producer and executive producer educator and on-air talent with experience spanning terrestrial radio online and podcasts since 2005. Her life and audio is all encompassing. Her most recent offering on NPR Life Kit is about how to mind your business, and currently she is helping people bring their podcasts to life via her company. Philo’s Future Media. TK also serves as a board member for the Association of Independents in Radio. Eric is the campaigns coordinator at the National Writers Union and member organizer with the Freelance Solidarity Project. Organizations that have advocated for freelance isn’t free legislation in places like New State and Illinois. Welcome to the show guys. Thanks so much for coming on this morning. Thanks for having us.


BTW, free-lancers count as "self-employed," right?

469
16
Protestation (discuss.tchncs.de)
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 
470
6
Protestation (discuss.tchncs.de)
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 
471
 
 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/2028473

Here's an excerpt from the article:


Cancer Survivor and Retiree Advocate/UFT member Sheila Zukowsky said she celebrated the day she turned 65 because it meant she could finally start claiming her traditional Medicare benefits.

“I didn’t like turning 65 — but I could finally go to the hospital that was around the corner from my house where everybody took my healthcare,” Zukowsky said. “There was no longer a problem — I got great treatment and I’m here to today. There’s no way they’re gonna take away our Medicare. No matter what they do — we’re gonna fight like hell against them.”

The private health insurance industry’s hard sell — with it promises of reduced up front costs, dental coverage, gym memberships and the like — has resulted in more than half of all Medicare eligible recipients in the country now being enrolled in a profit-driven Medicare Advantage plan.

Many of those recipients, however, now regret being taken in by the Medicare Advantage sales pitch — and feel trapped.

Even Mayor Adams jeered Medicare Advantage as a “bait and switch” before winning election and doing an abrupt about-face after taking office.

A great many Medicare eligible recipients also do not even realize that a privatized, profit-driven Medicare Advantage plan is not Medicare — something that privatization advocates are loath to admit.

The Save Medicare Act, reintroduced in the House last year, seeks to prohibit giant insurance companies from advertising their profit-driven plans as “Medicare.”

“Michael Mulgrew keeps saying Medicare Advantage is just Medicare Part C — that’s an absolute lie,” Retiree Advocate/UFT member Norm Scott said on Friday. “We know the difference. I’ve been on Medicare for 14 years — I love it. I’ve had no problems.”

Retiree Advocate/UFT member Sarah Shapiro said, “It’s difficult when you know the city is fighting against you,” but that “it’s really difficult when you know the people in our union leadership are fighting against the rank & file — and the retirees.”

Fellow Retiree Advocate/UFT member Bobby Greenberg’s work on national labor campaigns with the American Federation of Teachers goes back a half century. What’s needed, and what Retiree Advocate/UFT promises, he said is a return to authentic union culture centered on empowering the membership

“[Mulgrew] said this is the best plan we can get — he still says that. That plan died — it was killed by us,” Greenberg said. “We’re winning because the guns have shifted from us — to the working teachers. Now, it’s their healthcare being attacked…what we need is a different culture. We need a culture that welcomes the members.”

Retiree Advocate/UFT Jonathan Halabi said the Retired Teachers Chapter had two critical jobs to do under Mulgrew and Murphy’s watch: protect pensions and healthcare. But they have failed at both.

“Medicare Advantage, Aetna, Alliance — that’s not protecting our healthcare,” Halal said. “That’s Mulgrew, Murphy, Mayor Adams, and the MLC endangering our healthcare…who knows what they have in store four our pensions? Reitrees will vote for the team that will protect our healthcare and our pensions.”


I still feel that this article from this point-of-view isn't telling us everything and I get the feeling that it's not simply a matter of the typical "rank-and-file versus corrupt union leadership" story, but we'll see.

I haven't really seen the union leaders quoted here.

But I could be wrong; I just feel that the article isn't really giving us the full story.

472
 
 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/2027287

As a Turk, I approve.

But of course, the Turkish republic should be replaced with a socialist one. Strengthen democracy and continue the movement for it. Fight for reforms, but also revolution. And create dual power as well.

And of course, the Kurdish nationalist movement should be appeased and given their wants and needs and what they demand.

That is all I have to say on that matter.

473
9
Protestation (discuss.tchncs.de)
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 
474
 
 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/2026007

Excerpt:


A movie “based on” the life of a real person is a tricky proposition, especially when that person is already the subject of much historical study. How can the ambiguities, contradictions, ironies, paradoxes, and other complexities—not to mention sheer unknowability—of a person be fitted into narrative coherence? Entertainment, story, spectacle, and celebrity/star power have often taken precedence over historically verifiable facts.

A “biographical picture” or biopic is supposed to be distinct from a documentary. Documentaries purport to be nonfictional, but they may include dramatized recreations. Biopics are fictional but purport to avowedly dramatize real lives, or at least parts of lives. Do an internet search for “biopic lawsuits” to get a taste of the resulting controversies, going back to, at least, Lawrence of Arabia (1962)—individuals and relatives have taken serious exception to their cinematic portrayals.

Just as the movie version of a classic novel may be a bad way of studying for an English literature exam, biopics may not be the best biographical sources. This is not to suggest that these can’t be good movies. Last year’s Napoleon isn’t a good example, as it’s made with what seems complete contempt for biography and history. Oppenheimer is a better example: it’s relatively accurate. Critics have generally been affirmative. The box office has been especially boffo. Thirteen Academy Award nominations, including for all the major awards, highlight the industry’s own approval.

Oppenheimer is a rich, complex, impressive entertainment that whets the appetite for more: more biography, more history. I doubt I was the only one wondering about Lewis Strauss (pronounced “straws”), who is played by Robert Downey Jr. Luckily, there’s a much more about Oppenheimer and his times to dig into.

If you haven’t seen the movie, this is your SPOILER ALERT. Of course, history is nothing but spoilers, giving real impetus to the proverb “forewarned is forearmed”…

An iconic twentieth-century figure celebrated and damned as the “father of the atomic bomb,” J. Robert Oppenheimer (1904–67) has often been described as a Hamlet-like enigma torn between his pride and guilt over the A-bomb, his celebrity, and his governmental humiliation. This clearly presents a challenge to historians, biographers, and dramatists.


I had heard about this from other CPUSA members, but wasn't sure.

Article says so at the end.

475
6
Protestation (discuss.tchncs.de)
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 
view more: ‹ prev next ›