this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
38 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3015 readers
143 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (14 children)

It's perfect for Labour. They get to shower Rishi in shit until the general election and then quietly deselect her or move her aside for an actual candidate. Why wouldn't you?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (11 children)

Principles

Maybe its hard for the current labour party to understand that, but the party of the workers should not welcome hardcore right wingers no matter what the circumstances are

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Principles

but the party of the workers should not welcome hardcore right wingers no matter what the circumstances are

I think you've got principles and policies mixed up. What you've described is a policy.

A principle for a party of workers might be: To champion workers rights for the betterment of society.

A policy for that principle could be: to not accept right wing nutters into your party because they are inherently anti worker.

But equally another policy could be: publicly humilate incumbent anti worker government in an election cycle by accepting a defector from their party knowing full well it will be temporary because they're standing down in the next election.

In a crucial election year one policy is infinitely better than the other.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This government don't need any more humiliation, this only humiliated Labour by having a former member of the government be allowed to sit among them

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

That's not how the news cycle sees it. If we are to believe the left wing rhetoric that the entire media is against Labour always and forever then the media proclaiming a win for Starmer and a humiliation for Sunak speaks volumes. And that's what most of the electorate will see as well.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

There are two points here, and I'm going to sidestep whether her joining Labour is a good idea and focus on the other.

This government don't need any more humiliation

I'm afraid I'm going to have to disagree with this. We have seen repeatedly that people's memories are like goldfish. You have to keep it up for an extended period to stick, otherwise we will end up with the news cycle burying positive news for boosting the Tories.

All it takes is a bad angle of a bacon sandwich, and the press vultures will completely blow up any negative thing they can to derail Labour.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)