this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
1642 points (96.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

5913 readers
2945 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

the protocol does not require the current energy use. it could be run on two raspberry pis.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Are you a bot? You've said that.

Are you seriously suggesting that in the future the Bitcoin network will be running on 2 pis? No. Energy consumption will continue to be 50000 times greater than other PoS blockchains.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Under what scenario does bitcoin reduce energy intensity by >99%

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's partially knowable.

I know monkeys are not going to fly out of my butt.

I know that while Bitcoin exists, it's energy consumption is not going to reduce by over 99%

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I know monkeys are not going to fly out of my butt.

no, you don't. you can't have evidence about the future because it hasn't happened.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm not asking for evidence. I'm asking for any hypothetical scenario that allows bitcoin to compete with PoS on energy consumption.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

since you can't have evidence, you can't know.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't have evidence, but I know monkeys are not going to fly out of my butt.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

So ... Bitcoin matching PoS energy consumption is as knowable as monkeys flying out of my butt.

Gotcha. Conversations like this are what give Bitcoin Maxis a bad name.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

i haven't taken any position on "bitcoin maxis". i'm only discussing the protocol and the limits of knowledge. you are making all manner of leaps of logic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

A Maxi would be unable to admit that there is no imaginable scenario where the bitcoin protocol will drop to the low energy requirements of a PoS blockchain.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

there is no energy requirement at all for either mining method. the protocols are energy-agnostic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Incorrect. Bitcoin protocol is designed to distribute bitcoin to whoever provides the most energy (work).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

it's all just guess-and-check. a raspberry pi could find the next block even today.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Agreed. Because they can't provide enough power to prove the required work.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

i think you read a word that isn't there. the work of generating a nonce, hashing the header, and checking for leading zeroes can certainly be done by a raspberry pi in under the 10 minute block time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

A raspberry pi could verify a bitcoin block. It is EXTREMELY unlikely to find the next block.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

unlikely, given the network hashrate, but not impossible.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

A hash rate that requires 170TWh of electricity. There are no scenarios where this drops more than 99%, except for the destruction of bitcoin.