this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
14 points (64.0% liked)

Middle East and North Africa

77 readers
24 users here now

Rules:

Rule 0. Comments must be on topic, off topic comments lead to immediate ban. Off topic comments are any comments that will lead to diverging from the post's topic. If you want to discuss something post about it.

Rule 1. No refutation without a source. Any bias against MENA sources could lead to a ban if not backed with evidence. The burden of proof is on you.

Rule 2. This community is first and foremost for people from the region. Foreigners trying to justify military intervention or genocide are not welcomed.

Breaking of these rules may result in a 500-3000 day ban.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

US Navy fighter pilots have described as “traumatizing” their encounters with Yemen’s Armed Forces launching daring strikes on Israeli-owned and -bound shipping in the Red Sea in retaliation for the occupying regime’s months-long genocide against Palestinians in the besieged Gaza Strip.

The fighter pilots came home in Virginia on Friday after nine months of maritime clashes with the Yemeni military and their missile and drone strikes, in what CBS News referred to as “the most intense running sea battle the Navy has faced since World War II.”

Hey, the verbage and wording is very non-native and shows that this is an article authored by someone who wants others to think this is tough. And the url shows an Iranian country code. Hard to believe the most intense running sea battle since WW2 would be in a desert with folks using man pads and guerrilla tactics.

Good effort on trying to represent your country's perspective but it's not holding up to scrutiny.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Good effort on trying to represent your country’s perspective but it’s not holding up to scrutiny.

You came over here bro. Pathetic behaviour.

load more comments (2 replies)