2
Real people's real problems? Nah, it's AI Welfare Debate Week here at the EA Forums
(forum.effectivealtruism.org)
Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.
AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)
This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.
[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]
I have decided to fossick in this particular guano mine. Let’s see here… “10 Cruxes of Artificial Sentience.” Hmm, could this be 10 necessary criteria that must be satisfied for something “Artificial” to have “Sentience?” Let’s find out!
Wow! And I’m sure we’re about to hear about how this one has solved it.
Ok let’s gloss over these ten cruxes… hmm. Ok so they aren’t criteria for determining sentience, just ten concerns this guy has come up with in the event that AI achieves sentience. Crux-ness indeterminate, but unlikely to be cruxes, based on my bias that EA people don't word good.
Ah yes, the urge to align AI vs. the urge to appease our AI overlords. We’ve all been there, buddy.
I’ve always thought that if you take the tensor product of PETA and the entire transcript of the sequences, you get EA.
Lol no. We wouldn’t need to care.
lol
also lol
maybe TBC, there's 8 more "cruxes"
How much do I need to smoke to get in this level of naval gazing?
It’s less the amount of smoke and more the kind of smoke. It’s the magic smoke that comes out of fried electronics