this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
228 points (97.5% liked)

News

23367 readers
3138 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (8 children)

By your logic, there would be nothing wrong with polar bears rolling into town and eating the species threatening their survival.

How on Earth is that my logic?

If a specific animal poses a direct threat to humans pretty much anywhere on the planet, that animal is killed. That's just how things work. I'm sorry polar bears are getting desperate for food due to our causing climate change, but that doesn't mean we should put people's lives at risk too.

[–] moncharleskey 0 points 2 months ago (7 children)

The difference between the two of us is that you think humans are more important than other animals and I don't. If this polar bear killed a few humans in Iceland, I'm not saying those particular humans would deserve it, but we as a species do. This polar bear didn't do anything wrong. It has no capacity to, it was just trying to survive. Maybe instead of destroying anything that may potentially be a threat to humans, we should protect the planet we live on and the habitats of our fellow plants and animals. It's in our own best interests too. No sense arguing about it though, I doubt either of us will change our minds.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

You would not care if a polar bear mauled a playground full of toddlers. Noted.

Good luck getting pretty much anyone who has any say in these matters to agree with you on that.

[–] moncharleskey 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Really? Is this you? Because this sure sounds like you saying that the children's lives matter less than the bear's since this is your argument to not kill the bear:

It's either the bear or the people in a case like this. You don't wait for it to go on a killing spree at a school and then go, "oopsies!"

[–] moncharleskey 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do you seriously lack reading comprehension skills? The section of my comment you've pointed out says that I value them equally, not that polar bears are more valuable than humans, and not that humans are more valuable than polar bears. This is why I knew it was pointless to argue with you, because you aren't doing it in good faith. Go protect your imaginary school from the polar bears massing an imminent attack if you want to act like this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm arguing in good faith. This is one polar bear vs. a lot of humans. And you are arguing not to kill the bear. So you obviously put the bear at a higher level than humans.

[–] moncharleskey 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A rare polar bear that was spotted in a remote village in Iceland was shot by police after being considered a threat, authorities have said.

The bear was killed in the north-west tip of the country after police consulted the national environment agency, which declined to have the animal relocated, according to the Westfjords police chief, Helgi Jensson.

“It’s not something we like to do,” Jensson said. “In this case … the bear was very close to a summer house. There was an old woman in there.”

The owner, who was alone, was frightened and locked herself upstairs as the bear rummaged through her garbage, Jensson said. She contacted her daughter in Reykjavik, the capital, by satellite link, and called for help.

She stayed there,” Jensson said, adding that other summer residents in the area had gone home. “She knew the danger.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

What's your point, that they should have waited until the bear wandered into a town?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)