Meta

I asked you why you are right and the U.N. is wrong. You’ve refused to answer that.

No, I've answered why a commission that was looking at only part of the situation could not, by design, conclude to anything else that crime against humanity. That's why I've added the historical element, that you still keep ignoring, for the third time, when it's the main argument in the first place.

You’ve also refused to provide any examples of a reputable international organization that disagrees with the U.N.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Uyghurs_in_China#Genocide

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Uyghurs_in_China#Ethnocide_or_cultural_genocide

This is what I refer to "wilful ignorance".

Could also check the ICIJ if you'd like independent orgs.

All you’ve done is lie about what the U.N. report says

No, what I did was just pointing out that you were lying by minimizing the actual content of this report, and once I made that obvious, resorted to legalism.

“This has included far-reaching, arbitrary and discriminatory restrictions on human rights and fundamental freedoms, in violation of international laws and standards”, including restrictions on religious freedom and the rights to privacy and movement.

Furthermore, the report said that Chinese Government policies in the region have “transcended borders”, separating families, “severing” contacts, producing “patterns of intimidations and threats” against the wider Uyghur diaspora who have spoken out about conditions at home.

Let's add to that the settlement colonialism and all the other shit I've listed previously, and tell me how it's not an attempt to erase Uyghurs identity and people.

pretend you don’t understand the difference between genocide and mistreatment of prisoners

I do. I guess the holocaust was not a genocide because they were also all rounded up in camps as prisoners. That's legalism that only libshit used to use.

Can you tell me how the following fits the category of "mistreatment of prisoners" more than "genocide" maybe?

• Force them to erase their culture and identity by forcing the loss of customs, culture, religion and language through torture and punishment, even execution (historical)
• Force them to erase their culture and identity by forcing the loss of customs, culture, religion and language through torture and punishment, even execution (modern continuation)
• Have a separate set of laws between undesirables and desirables
• Force this ethnicity to disappear by settling the region with a "purer" ethnicity, having forced marriages and different reproduction quotas for both ethnicities while also having a national policy to send settlers directly live in their home.
• When this doesn't work fast enough and the oppressed people start to rebel one time too many, put them in camps per the millions, deny having camps, when it's too obvious you're lying, lie more saying that's just re-education camps, when it doesn't work again, call them terrorists internment camps.
• Once put into camps, separate the childrens that you'll brainwash into identity erasure

When I see this kind of shit happening in Gaza, I call it a genocide, even before the oct. 7th events. Same in Armenia, Myanmar, Cambodia, Chechenia or whatever else other country doing this shit because I don't use selective acceptance of genocide.

I'm sure you won't answer to this following the argumentative playbook of an authoritarian troll that will most likely dismiss any provided source as western propaganda, or with an argumentative mille-feuilles full of the stupidest takes I've seen.