this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
197 points (85.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43989 readers
727 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The notion that free* healthcare, free* education, subsidised transport, government provided unemployment supports etc is even labelled β€œsocialist” strikes me as particularly American.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Having lived for quite a long time in canada, I think most Americans would love the it.

Semi related - The USA is already socialist if you consider they have more spent per capita on healthcare, and pay for things like roads, police, fire departments, schools and the like. On the last point, they pay all the way through High School and then significantly subsidize universities as well. It's all a matter of degree. In the usa, we socialize on many fronts, and then pay companies more than we would pay to socialize the same service and consider that better. Imo, it's very much not.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not sure if spending more per capita means "socialize" healthcare. Isn't the problem with US healthcare is that "accessing healthcare at any time without the worry of financial burden" is not currently true for everyone?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I think your definition is a fine one. I think the Nuance I was trying to make and perhaps did poorly was that the US already pays a huge amount for healthcare but we pay it to companies to do research that they then use to make profit worldwide. Not to provide services for everyone. It's a matter of priority

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Socialism isn't a welfare state, socialism is when the workers own the means of production.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No no no

Socialism is when the government does things, and when the government does a lot of things, that's communism.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

#jokeslibsthatwanthealthcaredontget

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Don’t forget the farmers who are subsidized.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

supports

That's a strut. Did you just mean 'support'?