this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
345 points (98.1% liked)

Asklemmy

43945 readers
633 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

A game similar to the Expanse and Firefly. A space exploration, trading and combat game where you fly around a single solar system in a small ship and can also land on planets (please not procedurally generated though. Just make fewer places you can visit, but design them).
Oh, and with realistic Newtonian physics. Even if that means combat will be largely about who can fire the most missiles. But it would also mean you can avoid enemies altogether by planning the right planetary slingshot, millions of miles before you'd meet them.

Outer Wilds comes close, but I'd love something more gritty, realistic and on a bigger scale.

[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Evochron. One dev, super dedicated to this concept.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

So basically Anno 2307?

I haven't played Anno 2205, but what your describing seems a bit further in time than that game. The start of colonization of the Moon vs settling/trading with the full solar system.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Elite Dangerous has some of those elements, not quite what you're describing rhough