Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.
I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!
It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
7. Content should match the theme of this community.
-Content should be Mildly infuriating.
-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.
...
8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.
-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.
...
...
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.
So, Instagram has started pushing threads into users’ feed, and every now and then we get a glimpse into the unmoderated crapshoot that is that app…
L.E.: should be noted I do not have a threads account, have never even downloaded the app, this is sorta like “advertising” to try to convince you to move to their platform.
I don't think most of us here are laughing, a motivating factor to move away from places like Instagram and Reddit for me was their habit of ignoring far-right activity while punishing left activity. Some of us here are active on the internet in part because we know there are a lot of Nazis active too.
I'm pretty sure reddit and most social media is bias to the left. Maybe you should check your own beliefs as it sounds like you are part of the radical left like most people here.
When I say far right I'm talking about antisemitic beliefs that are often rooted in racist religious beliefs. That's not your average conservative.
Well yes, I am part of the 'radical left', and proudly so, by that mean I believe in healthcare, food and a place to live for all people regardless of any qualifier and think the political/economic systems in place now will not achieve that.
I agree the average conservative is not a believer in that sort of antisemitism, but it's not uncommon. In the terms of US politics, social media platforms do have a left bias, from a more global perspective though they are center or center-right, and overall just do whatever will protect their profits. Reddit, Twitter, others will ban left-wing and anti-capitalist groups and allow their algorithms to push content they know encourages far-right violence because it generates more activity.
Furthermore, they may not believe in the Nazi sort of antisemitism, but ask them if this is a Christian country. Ask them if there should be Christian prayer in schools. For a real laugh, ask them if Passover should be made a federal holiday like Christmas.
Because their likely answers to all of those are, at a certain level, antisemitic. Maybe not knowingly so, but still antisemitic. It is antisemitic (and anti-every other group that isn't Christian) to expect this to be a Christian country that works on Christian principles.
What you call antisemitic is just not being a Jewish nation. If you are Jewish you are free to believe what you want without being blow up or harmed. Attacking the Jewish population and or blaming them for historical events is what I consider antisemitic.
You do bring up a good point about the US being a sort of Christian nation. I guess that is history I suppose.
No.
If you say America is a Christian nation, you are being antisemitic.
If you say there should be Christian prayer in American schools, you are being antisemitic.
If you say under no circumstances should a Jewish holiday be given the same prominence as a Christian holiday, you are being antisemitic.
You just don't realize it.
Absurd. An attempt to establish your own religion as the dominant religion is not a result of a specific bias against Jews, as antisemitism implies. It is a belief that oneself is superior that results in a bias against anyone who is different
Calling it antisemitic is a tacit prioritization of your own marginalization over the marginalization of others, which fundamentally comes from the same mindset
Antisemitism implies no such thing.
Also, how is it a prioritization when I specifically said: (and anti-every other group that isn’t Christian)
Or when you said 'your own' did you mean 'everyone who is not Christian?'
Because it's antisemitic and antiHindu and antiMuslim and anti-every other religion to suggest Christianity deserves any legal primacy in America.
"If God truly does exist, He more so loves the atheist who questions the world around him than the Christian who blindly follows." -Thomas Jefferson
More than half of the Founding Fathers were agnostic/atheists. They specifically wrote the Constitution to keep (any kind of) religion out of the government. The idea that America has ever been a "Christian nation" is rooted in a false history meant to deny the right of religious freedom to others. Pushing Christian holidays and religious rights while ignoring equal treatment of other religions is definitely antisemitism, just not the blowing up temples kind. It's also anti-every other kind of religion as well. "Equal but different" wasn't equal in regards to gay marriage or segregation, and it certainly isn't in regards to religious freedom.
Our history is full of "little" lies like this designed to shape our perception of the country. Such as the fact that we're never told that the Puritans were a bunch of religious extremists who came to America because they were exiled from England after trying to assassinate the king and replace him with their own puppet to force their religion on the rest of the country. Or that Hitler was inspired by America's treatment of the Native Americans when it came to dealing with the Jews, immigrants, and LGBTQ people in Germany, and considered the US a "sister nation" with similar ideals to his (he even talks about it in one of his books). The entirety of Europe hides the fact along with us that the Nazis had a lot of support and that most leaders at the time didn't want to get involved in fighting Germany right up until they invaded their country specifically. Did you know there's a statue in Ireland honoring the various Native American tribal nations for their humanitarian aid during the Potato Famine because they were some of the only groups to provide any aid? Or that there wasn't even actually a famine at all? There was a food shortage, but there was plenty of food - if you were British. The British tried to starve the Irish in an ethnic cleansing so they could take their land.
I ain't here to say you're bad or stupid or some nonsense because of your opinion, but as Thomas Jefferson said, question why it's okay to put a statue of the Ten Commandments on display at a state capitol building but not a statue of Baphomet teaching kids science next to it, because you'll often be surprised to find that the history we've been taught isn't the whole story. I know I keep being surprised the more I learn. There's tons of little things we take for granted in our daily life that are rooted in systems built with malicious intent. I'm still disgusted by the fact that one of the architects building the highways in New York designed the bridges around where he lived to be too low for buses to go under specifically so black kids couldn't take the bus to the beaches near his neighborhood.
I agree with you completely. That's doesn't change the fact that we celebrate Christmas. It doesn't need to religious for everyone but most people in the US want to celebrate Christmas and not necessarily Hanuka.
I have full respect for people are Jewish or Islamic or something else.
Maybe, but Christmas (as in the day of, December 25th) is still a Christian holiday. It's a pretty safe assumption to make that the majority of people celebrate Christmas, especially the commercialized version that's ingrained into our culture, but it's still an assumption made with Christianity as the default/majority that doesn't take into account anybody else. Unconsciously assuming everybody is one thing because the majority of people are that thing can silence/oppress those that aren't.
This is why the big stink every year over Merry Christmas vs Happy Holidays is inherently antisemitic/anti-other religions. Because it refuses to acknowledge that there are other people in this country who practice other religions with other holidays (or don't practice any religion at all). If you make an exception for one (making Christmas a federal holiday), but not for the other (Passover in this case), then they're being treated unequally and therefore you don't have freedom of religion and are biased against the second one. Because the followers of Judaism in that example cannot practice their religion and celebrate their holiday to the same degree as Christians can.
For true equality you either accommodate all religions by making every single religious holiday a federal holiday or you accommodate none of them. Obviously, the first option is impossible, so you limit federal holidays to days of importance outside of religion, and allow enough vacation days to ensure people can celebrate at least most of their holidays. Days like the 4th of July, voting day(s) (a big one that we don't do), etc should be federal holidays, but not Christmas or Easter. Outside the government, this is how it's handled. Businesses are free to choose what holidays they close to celebrate or stay open for, and cannot get in trouble for what holidays they decide to give off or not give off for their employees. This is why the Jewish and Chinese communities are historically so close in the US - neither celebrates Christmas, so Jewish people go to Chinese food restaurants and other Chinese businesses that would otherwise not get much business on the holiday. It's also why retail stores can make their employees work on Christian holidays, regardless of whether or not they're Christian (speaking of which, you never hear an outrage about people being forced to work on Christmas day, yet there's a guaranteed frothing of the mouth over the Happy Holidays thing every single year).
That's the antisemitism inherent in our culture. That people are willing and want to support allowances for Christian religious institutions and values like holidays and prayers in school, but would not be okay with the same allowances for Judaism or other religions. In the same way that the architect I mentioned making the bridges too low so black kids couldn't go to the beaches near his house was an act of racism.
I would say if social media has any form of left leaning bias in regards to US politics, it's entirely down to the userbase and not the platform. It's been shown that content from left-wing politicians and groups gets buried by the algorithms on places like Facebook and Twitter when compared to content from right-wing groups and politicians on a pretty consistent basis.
I'm not sure there is alternative to "capitalism" as you call it. As it turns out we are all greedy and to add salt to the wound all of the Communist revolutions failed within a short time and caused a lot of bloodshed.
I'm scarred of communism because it causes death and starvation in the end. What you all a right wing bias is the same to me as removing violent and harmful content. You legitimately scare me. (That's not suppose to be insulting) We are no longer locked in a cold war so the best course of action I suppose is to just ignore you.
All that is baseless capitalist propaganda
Please define 'the radical left.'
I'm mostly referring to the people who politically very liberal.
I think you have some definition issues here... Because 'liberal' according to my dictionary when used in a political sense means "relating to or denoting a political and social philosophy that promotes individual rights, civil liberties, democracy, and free enterprise."
That really doesn't sound especially radical to me.
Care to try again?
Sounds to me like OP has the Asleep Mind Virus.
That isn't even close to a definition, that is basically just a synonym.
It is like describing a cube as cubistic.
Yeah really weird how you people claim to not support racist religious fascists yet vote for them every time
Fucking fascist doesn’t even know the difference between liberal and leftist