this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
1099 points (97.7% liked)

Comic Strips

12796 readers
2818 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 34 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Isn't this the story of the original Gwen Stacy? Spiderman tries to save her, but does exactly this and the force on her body kills her anyway.

It's been a long, long time since I have read the comics but iirc, it was a defining point in the spiderman canon.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago (4 children)

He used his web to grab her from above. I think her neck snaps from the whiplash?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I just rewatched the scene on YT, and he's actually just a bit too late, and her head slams into the ground with full force.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I was thinking of the comic, but I guess it makes sense tocdo it that way in a movie meant for kids. A neck snapping might be a bit grim

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And whipping a skull into concrete isn’t grim?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

I don't experience it myself, so I couldn't say why it is the case, but I've known people who felt more freaked out or unsettled by things like death via necks snapping. If I were to try and guess, maybe it is easier to process direct impact causing lethal trauma than something that seems less... sonething? Idk. Maybe someone who has experienced this can explain.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If we are talking emma stone, she is specifically shown hitting her head during the whiplash which is what kills her

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

I was referring to the original version in the comic. I haven't followed all the revisions and alternate universes to know the variations.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I guess it wasn't quite her tempo?

[–] JasonDJ 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

J. Jonah Jameson? How did you end up with a drumstick?

Did you go through a portal? Was it a spirit portal?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

He just clicked his heels and transported from Oz.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I mean, when a person suddenly falls, there's really just no way to save them, is there?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

There is. You just need to spread out the deceleration from a few centimeters to a few meters in the falling direction, and make sure the force is being applied all over their body, not just a few spots (think bouncy castle vs rebar).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

There is a video of someone jumping from a plane with no parachute into cardboard boxes

[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It wasn't originally. It was essentially the scene from the first Spider Man movie where Goblin makes Spidey swoop in to save her, but she was already dead.

They retconned it later to make it so Spidey killed her, which is a better story.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's the other way around, actually.

In The Amazing Spider-Man #125 (Oct. 1973), Marvel Comics editor Roy Thomas wrote in the letters column that "it saddens us to have to say that the whiplash effect she underwent when Spidey's webbing stopped her so suddenly was, in fact, what killed her. In short, it was impossible for Peter to save her. He couldn't have swung down in time; the action he did take resulted in her death; if he had done nothing, she still would certainly have perished. There was no way out." Source

The comic (#121) is ambiguous though. There is really no way for the reader to know whether she was dead before her neck was snapped, Green Goblin certainly seems to think so (but he is hardly a reliable source). But snapping her neck certainly would have killed her anyway.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I didn't think it was ambiguous at all. The word "snap" is printed at her neck when it happens.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If you read my comment, I said it's ambiguous if she was already dead when her neck was snapped, not that her neck was in fact snapped.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm disagreeing. The ambiguity was retconned later because Marvel didn't want to commit to Spider-Man "causing" her death.

In the original comic, she is alive and looks like she's in a state of shock according to Peter. Goblin even threatens to kill her, further confirming she is alive. She gets pushed over the edge of the bridge, and he neck is snapped when the web stops her fall. The clear intent in the story telling is that she is alive until the snap. You even quote Roy Thomas stating as such in print a few episodes later.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

OK, now I understand what you're getting at and I don't disagree actually. I also think that the original intent was that she died of a broken neck but the ambiguity is there, whether by design or accident, which makes other theories and later retconning possible. I personally suspect they made it a bit ambiguous to give themselves a bit of a back door in case the public would react too harshly to Spidey accidentally kiling his girlfriend. One has to remember how unexpected and grim this was at the time, it was a huge risk to take for the writers (Stan Lee even said later that he was tricked into OKing it while he was packing for a trip...not sure I believe that though).

It would have been easy to make her perhaps say something or make a sound when she's lying on the edge of the bridge, or make Peter feel her pulse to confirm she was alive before the fall. As the scene unfolds now, and the way she is drawn when lying on the edge (she looks dead), I feel its unlikely that wasn't intentional. But this is ultimately a matter of interpretation.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I’m the wrong guy to ask, I haven’t a clue about comic character lore and canon.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago

Generally when people postike this, on an open forum, they're asking readers in general. It wasn't directed specifically at you, but was a response to what you said.