sh.itjust.works Main Community

7732 readers

1 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

De-federate from instances with loli (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

114 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Can we get a consensus on whether our community should de-federate with servers that host loli? I personally think we should block them, and if that ends up not being the consensus here then I'll probably sign up on another server. I hope we can all agree to set that boundary though because I like it here and it seems otherwise pretty cool.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Disregarding an argument because it contains a fallacy is a fallacy too.

We've seen this happen on Reddit and I've seen it happen in multiple subs. The comment might have been alarmist but given past examples it's not unfounded.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Tu quoque is a fallacy. Pointing out fallacies isn't, I checked.

I cant say that defederating is the right or wrong move, I'm just tired of bad faith argument. There is a balance to be stricken between regulation and libertarianism, the question to be answered is where that balance lies. Disavowing any new regulation as an inevitable descent into complete loss of freedom is ridiculous.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't disagree with your stance. I just want to point out that the fallacy exists. It's called the "Fallacy fallacy" or "Argument from fallacy"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well shit, I stand corrected. Props to you. /gen

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Not appearing on a list with a Latin name doesn't mean something isn't a fallacy either. They're inventing all sorts of new and exciting ways to be wrong lately.