this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
187 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2256 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 99 points 8 months ago (5 children)

So Trump moved money around from one PAC to another, all in the hopes of juggling some of that money into his own pocket. It would be a real shame if some investigative journalist were to track down all of those different transfers and discover some of them were against FEC rules. A darn shame.

[–] [email protected] 100 points 8 months ago (1 children)

At this point it would just get added to the list of stuff that doesn't get dealt with.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Scheduled to be heard in 35 years

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago

At Mar-a-Lago, by a judge he appointed.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The FEC has been aware for years that Trump is doing illegal things; it just has enough loyalists installed that it's been giving him a free pass because he's above the law.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 8 months ago

Over 10 years ago Colbert did an entire series showing how PAC money can legally be moved into a politician's personal account.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colbert_Super_PAC

[–] [email protected] 32 points 8 months ago

I’m all for it, but I’ve recently become jaded as to the consequences of it. He’s stealing money again! What are they going to do? Just ignore it harder?

I’m so tired of our frayed legal system.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Oh, he's been reported a bunch of times recently for violating campaign finance laws. Problem is, the FEC just keeps declining to investigate any of these reports.

[–] Infinite 3 points 8 months ago

What do you want them to do?

Their jobs?!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

Imagine being dumb enough to send your extra income to pay some rich assholes' lawyers for him. Except that 50 bible, Jesus was all about prestige bibles.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

And where's the news? I do hope Americans are aware that PACs and SPACs do not have such regulations to prevent them from being used in this way. If Trump wants to spend the money buying Funions and Funkopops, he can. Sorry, if the PACs that are in no way affiliated with Trump personally want to do that, they can.