this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
331 points (95.6% liked)

Privacy

32177 readers
616 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I use Firefox and Firefox Mobile on the desktop and Android respectively, Chromium with Bromite patches on Android, and infrequently Brave on the desktop to get to sites that only work properly with Chromium (more and more often - another whole separate can of worms too, this...) And I always pay attention to disable google.com and gstatic.com in NoScript and uBlock Origin whenever possible.

I noticed something quite striking: when I hit sites that use those hateful captchas from Google - aka "reCAPTCHA" that I know are from Google because they force me to temporarily reenable google.com and gstatic.com - statistically, Google quite consistently marks the captcha as passed with the green checkmark without even asking me to identify fire hydrants or bicycles once, or perhaps once but the test passes even if I purposedly don't select certain images, and almost never serves me those especially heinous "rolling captchas" that keep coming up with more and more images to identify or not as you click on them until it apparently has annoyed you enough and lets you through.

When I use Firefox however, the captchas never pass without at least one test, sometimes several in a row, and very often rolling captchas. And if I purposedly don't select certain images for the sake of experimentation, the captchas keep on coming and coming and coming forever - and if I keep doing it long enough, they plain never stop and the site become impossible to access.

Only with Firefox. Never with Chromium-based browsers.

I've been experimenting with this informally for months now and it's quite clear to me that Google has a dark pattern in place with its reCAPTCHA system to make Chrome and Chromium-based browsers the path of least resistance.

It's really disgusting...

(page 2) 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I never see them because I do not use google services for anything. However, I am willing to bet they are a way to justify their fingerprinting data used to identify people.

https://news.gatech.edu/news/2014/04/07/personal-touch-signature-makes-mobile-devices-more-secure

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I read that the "level of annoyance" (phrasing mine) has to do with your score (i.e. how likely Google thinks you are a bot). And I wouldn't be surprised if using any browser other than ones in their ecosystem reduces your score more.

Anyway, there are other captcha systems websites could use but choose not to.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Re: rolling captchas, I've noticed that when I select one wrong image in addition to or excluing one of their right images, I don't get rolling captchas. Maybe it a fluke, but its happened times that its become regular practice.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You just have to select exactly three correct images. When there are 4 correct images you only have to select 3

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I know. my point is I have been able to avoid rolling captchas by selecting one incorrect image & 2 correct ones. I have no idea if that's a glitch a fluke or something else.

It works for me, I haven't dealt with a single rolling captcha since March'23.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Wish we had some extension which could skip these CAPTCHA shits. I normally surf on mull (forked Firefox) though sometime have to use cromite (fork of bromite which is a fork of chromium) to access websites peacefully.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Oh, you said your blocking google.com and gstatic.com? Try privacy badger, Google uses a million other domains to track as well (Google Fonts for example) and privacy badger will let you find and block those kinds from domains from tracking or at least from leaving cookies if they are required for the site to work.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›