this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
225 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2349 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 115 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Donald Trump had a full-blown meltdown

How many more meltdowns before he becomes an angry puddle of orange faeces?

[–] solsangraal 69 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He saw what is to come and didn't like it. Simple as that. It all finally sank in.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Ap ap ap! After November, please and thank you.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He already looks like an elephant's foot.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago

You do make a compelling observation. The deadly toxicity is there for sure!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How many meltdowns until you become so crazy, it starts to resemble sanity?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

They say there's a fine like between genius and crazy, in which case I'm sure he'll be dead long before that happens

[–] [email protected] 75 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

He's mad cause the Democrats are absolutely crushing it. They went from being over 3 points behind in most polls with Biden, to now being almost 4 points ahead on average. He's ignored the advice of all his campaign advisors... he really couldn't help himself. Now he's relying on Elon to help him "win" the election and it isn't working as expected. All they have left it is perpetuate conspiracies & lies and hope that Twitter (X) has enough reach to change the outcome of the election. Musk isn't even hiding that he's manipulating the algorithms and allowing bots to run rampant anymore. THAT is their strategy to try to win. If he loses then Musk will immediately try to sell if he can, but X is now worth a small fraction of what he paid for it. I'd be surprised if he could get 2 billion for it. This was in 2023:

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/according-elon-musk-own-math-204413573.html

Musk will have literally thrown away $40+ billion if Kamala wins.

[–] [email protected] 70 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Musk has definitely thrown away $44+ Billion, regardless of the election outcome. He didn't buy twitter BECAUSE he wanted to manipulate an election in the future, he bought it because if he didn't the SEC had him dead to rights on stock manipulation charges. Musk had been openly claiming he was gonna buy twitter at meme-stock prices, driving up the stock price, without disclosing that he already owned a lot of twitter stock. He HAD to act like he meant it. It's also why he did everything he could to back out of the deal, including making up bullshit about how twitter lied about the state of the platform, he didn't want to go through with it. But Twitter came correct, proved they had their shit right, and literally forced him to go through with the sale.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If I had a legally binding offer of a billion dollars for my picket lint, I'd force that deal through, too. I kinda hate that Twitter sold out, but I wouldn't have done any different.

One of the sellers will go back and buy it off him for 250 million in a few years and have their cake and eat it, too.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Yeah I wouldn't eat that cake after all that musk has done to it

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Play by play? The whinefest was more like a Bray by bray.

Also can you believe this is a real poster from the Trump campaign and not something dreamed up by one of the late night comedy show hosts?

poster

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

WTF‽‽‽ Is that real??? That's gotta be AI generated.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Noooooope, it's real.

And the hilarious thing is that Trump and Giuliani listed as "Invited Guest Speaker"s doesn't necessarily mean they're coming!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

What would be absolutely hilarious is if they didn't show but the FBI did and grabbed all the people they missed/couldn't find lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

The keyword on the poster is "invited". We could all as can MAGAts by creating events that are $2,500 a head and saying Trump is invited to attend.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Melanie must be so fucken happy

[–] [email protected] 46 points 3 months ago (2 children)

She's still married to him. If he loses the election and the Republican party turns against him, and if he ends up having to pay half a billion in damages from his court cases, she'll run to the media with some sob story about how she felt she couldn't leave him sooner.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 months ago (1 children)

After leaving him, she can just make money by having someone ghost-write a "My Life With an Orange" book for her and selling that.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

if she didn’t sign an NDA lol

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That's why he got shot. She's released from an NDA when he dies. Did she look concerned or upset that day or was she smiling just before the trigger was pulled? Did she have a "special" relationship with a few of the Secret Service guys? I really wonder.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

Big if true. Someone need to look into it 😕

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Shot? Oh, he's going out the window of one of his own buildings.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Another poster had an interesting take today; She could have left him at any point and still be fucking a real billionaire while cruising the med in his super yacht.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The "deep end" business must be booming, as he seems to keep finding new ones to go off of.

[–] solsangraal 17 points 3 months ago

it's going to take generations to repair the damage that this toxic sack of rapey traitorous shit has done to american society

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

The Trump campaign is a conspiracy by Big Deep End to sell more deep end!

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago

May the twin albatrosses of Project 2025 and JD Vance sink him.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago

Occasionally, some of his posts veered into all-caps, probably when he was particularly upset, like when the Project 2025 manifesto was mentioned:  “LYING AGAIN ABOUT PROJECT 2025, WHICH SHE KNOWS, AND SO DO ALL DEMOCRATS, THAT I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH!” (She wasn’t lying.)

lol

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Catecholamine response isn’t good for the heart at his age.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Temper tantrum.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

In the end, he’s just coming across as desperately deranged.

LMAO nice one to end the piece with.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

MeltDon Trump?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 months ago

New Republic - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for New Republic:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://newrepublic.com/post/185214/trump-reaction-meltdown-kamala-harris-dnc-speech
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support