this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
100 points (93.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35868 readers
1581 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 18 hours ago

This is considered quote unquote "Lazy"

[–] [email protected] 13 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Wait, it's "quote unquote"? I have always been saying "quote on quote" my whole life.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 17 hours ago

Bone apple tea

[–] [email protected] 6 points 17 hours ago

That's your two sense, anyway

[–] [email protected] 9 points 19 hours ago

France is bacon

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Because "quote unquote" is done for a laugh typically and "quote unquote" sounds funnier and more pleasing to the ear.

[–] [email protected] 116 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's "quote unquote something" because most people who "quote something often forget to unquote afterwards.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And that breaks the processor and you have to reboot your listener and it's such a paaaaaiin.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago

Broke my brain, had to read 4 times to understand

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 day ago

I see what you did there.... 🤣

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They are just doing the autocomplete verbally, like when you type an opening quote and the end quote goes in automatically but the next thing you type goes inside the quotes

[–] [email protected] 8 points 23 hours ago

Plausible for programmers, at least

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

This is a solid take

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 day ago

If you are quoting a word or short phrase you use this form to make it quicker and easier for the listener to understand.

If you quote a long section, saying "quote, , unquote." is common and accepted.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's the verbal equivalent of quotation marks done as a hand gesture.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah—I think the canonical usage is to hold up your fingers as you say “quote unquote”, then lower your hands when the quote is complete.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

One hand for quote, the other for unquote

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago

If anyone did this in front of me I would smack them in the mouth.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

this is one of those things that I have wondered about for so long that I forgot to wonder about it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

How would I even know where the quote ended

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Professors and engineers, in my experience, tend to say "quote... the thing... end quote". Regular people on the other hand, are lazy, inconsistent and generally oblivious to whether or not they're being ambiguous.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Regular people on the other hand, are lazy, inconsistent and generally oblivious to whether or not they're being ambiguous.

me_irl

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Unrelated but until a month ago I've been saying "quote ON quote" until I saw it actually written 😂🤣

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

When I was younger I said quote END quote.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As a homeschooled kid, I usually had the opposite problem. Mispronounced so much shit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Archipelago.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I’ve heard it said both ways.

For example.

When the statement you’re quoting is going to be quote, short or simple, unquote.

Or, if it’s going to stand on its own and be quote, unquote, some long citation that would make famous Russian authors jealous.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I think I've most often heard quote unquote used sarcastically, like scare quotes in writing. When someone's quoting something seriously I usually hear the quote something unquote or a and I quote something.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Indeed. With very slowly pronounced “bunny ear finger quotes” as you say it to emphasize the sarcasm.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Usually I hear this as "quote something end quote"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

You'll hear it sometimes in French.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Tangential, but I don't understand why in American English you feel the need to say the word quote at all. In UK English we just use intenation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I'm from the UK and I feel like I've heard enough UK English speakers saying "quote" that I had never thought of it as an American thing. That isn't to say that the distinction you make doesn't exist though, just that it may be variable across demographics or contexts.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Can I quote you on that?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

It's useful for when you're quoting someone who happens to use the exact same intonation as you!

[–] altima_neo -3 points 1 day ago

Because it would be pretty silly to verbally say "quote" "the thing" and them finish of with "unquote" at the end, like some kind of robot.

The whole point of saying it is to clarify that you're quoting something.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

I think because one gets the point across easily while the other is pedantic