this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
1108 points (98.8% liked)

Science Memes

11148 readers
3282 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 12 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 32 points 13 hours ago

like and share if u would beat a billionare with a metal pole

[–] [email protected] 13 points 12 hours ago

Nature is wise

[–] [email protected] 15 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

If I had the opportunity for some street justice on a billionaire I wouldnt fucking hesitate. That said, it would change jack shit. His wealth just passes to the next asshole.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

In a hypothetical world where billionaires cannot go outside a security perimeter for fear of their lives, how soon would we see people refusing the inheritance or donating massive portions?

[–] Cethin 15 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It would change things if it becomes systemic. If they learn to be scared of being a billionaire, maybe they'd be less likely to want to become one.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I think they'd just hire more security. They have the money for it.

Edit: I agree with your sentiment though

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago

It is enough to have one person doing the inside job, but this will escalate too and... welcome to modern Russia

[–] [email protected] 121 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You and me baby aint nothing but mamals, so lets lead a revolution like on discovery channel

[–] [email protected] 24 points 15 hours ago

Every healthy economy has a robust guillotine maintenance capability.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 16 hours ago (17 children)

the maoist uprising against the landlords was the largest and most comprehensive proletarian revolution in history, and led to almost totally-equal redistribution of land among the peasantry

[–] [email protected] 15 points 16 hours ago
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 12 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 38 points 18 hours ago (6 children)

Did you know, chimps don't have remote killing drones, armored vehicles, or nuclear weapons.

Well human do, and its usually not the average person that have posession of those things.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Average military pay is like 2100/month so I guess if the dudes in charge of the nukes/drones/tanks decide to stop getting cucked by business interests it would probably be fine.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Or decide not to kill their relatives. Like in previous revolutions ;)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

That doesn't always happen, look at the massacres in South Korea before the end of the dictatorship.

The numbers on wikipedia are lower than actual numbers as questioning them could literally get you executed until the 90s. For example the official number for the Gwangju uprising is 165, but the city recorded an extra 2300 deaths above historical averages for May. That doesn't include thousands who were arrested, many of whom sentenced to death.

The government ordered the soldiers to shoot the protesters, and they did, and hardly anyone knows about it today.

Indonesia is also worth looking at.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 15 hours ago

In addition to what MattsAlt said, the people in possession of those things still rely on you and me to meet all their wants and needs. So a crucial first step before they become edible is for us to stop meeting their wants and needs. Exactly who "possesses" what starts to become a little more ambiguous when that happens.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 17 hours ago

Don't have to own em, just have to get the people paid to operate them on the right side

[–] [email protected] 7 points 13 hours ago

How many wars the US has won since WWII?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago

You should watch the movie Ants, it's an amazing example of why this line of reasoning doesn't hold water.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Eat the rich? They sure are making everything else too expensive.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Beat inflation at the grocery store (and everywhere else) with this one simple trick. Capitalists hate it!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

What am I missing? Counterfeit bills?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago

You're not missing anything. I shouldn't have included the pic but I had just seen it minutes before reading the post and it felt like it fit. The one simple trick is what you said: eating the rich.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 13 hours ago

Just FYI, BTW

[–] [email protected] 13 points 17 hours ago

They have a far more functional society than we do

load more comments
view more: next ›