this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
275 points (95.7% liked)

Don’t You Know Who I Am?

3818 readers
1 users here now

Posts of people not realising the person they’re talking to, is the person they’re talking about.

Acceptable examples include:

Discussions on any topic are encouraged but arguements are not welcome in this community. Participate in good faith - don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.

The posts here are not original content, the poster is not OP and doesn’t necessarily agree with or condone the views in the post. The poster is not looking to argue with you about the content in the post.

Rules:

This community follows the rules of the lemmy.world instance and the lemmy.org code of conduct. I’ve summarised them here:

  1. Be civil, remember the human.
  2. No insulting or harassing other members. That includes name calling.
  3. Censor any identifying info of private individuals in the posts. This includes surnames and social media handles.
  4. Respect differences of opinion. Civil discussion/debate is fine, arguing is not. Criticise ideas, not people.
  5. Keep unrequested/unstructured critique to a minimum. If you wish to discuss how this community is run please comment on the stickied post so all meta conversations are in one place.
  6. Remember we have all chosen to be here voluntarily. Respect the spent time and effort people have spent creating posts in order to share something they find amusing with you.
  7. Swearing in general is fine, swearing to insult another commenter isn’t.
  8. No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia or any other type of bigotry.
  9. No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.

Please report comments that break site or community rules to the mods. If you break the rules you’ll receive one warning before being banned from this community.

PLEASE READ LEMMY.ORG’S CITIZEN CODE OF CONDUCT: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html

PLEASE READ LEMMY.WORLD’S CODE OF CONDUCT: https://lemmy.world/legal

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This feels very much like an /r/thathappened post

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (7 children)

As a running enthusiast whose varied from running ~25 miles a week to having to restart from nothing, what the guy is talking about is extremely common. I've followed many different plans from many runners, sometimes their names are attached, sometimes not, and most of them I couldn't tell you what they look like. I will say Olympic runners are the most common. I've even come across hers. Nothing about this rings as implausible to someone remotely interested in the topic. I guess I could understand from a total outsider perspective, but from someone who looks into that topic often? Absolutely plausible. I see no reason not to believe them.

Edit: the amount of stories Tony Hawk posts like this and never gets questioned also just makes me wonder a bit about why multiple people have already commented the way you did.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wouldn't a guy analyze a guy's training instead of a women's? I don't run but I'd imagine that training would be at least a little different for women than it is for men.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Not really. I'm sure elite performers, possibly. But training plans aren't generally gendered from anything I've come across.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I’ve never paid attention to the sex or gender identity of who writes training programs if the credentials check out

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Or maybe he's an analyst.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (15 children)

This feels very much like a /r/nothungeverhappens comment.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Inside you there are two wolves.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

One smokes crack, The other smokes crack.

You are addicted to crack.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

God damn it Moon Moon.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

It's a good day at the Furry convention.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Oh damn, so I'm not a lone wolf?

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's because it is. We're supposed to expect that a random person had compiled detailed running stats on a person he just happened to sit next to on a plane.

This is just a story to manufacture outrage, like most of social media.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Where's the outrage? This is a funny story in the same vein as Tony Hawk's various "You look like Tony Hawk" moments. Its like everyone in this thread saw its a woman and assumed she's complaining instead of telling a fun story.

Edit as I realize half the comments trying to call this rage bait are literally just you instigating lol. Touch grass.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The outrage is because the person who made the original post is a woman.

The vast majority of men really don't like it when women do things or talk about their experiences, especially if the women are good at or enjoy the things they do and/or talk about men behaving like men towards them.

(Watch how fast I get down voted and mansplained to about how wrong I am, lmao)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m not sure why you assume the person was random. There’s no indication that she hops on planes randomly. Professional runners do a lot of traveling to and from events, and it makes sense that other people connected to the sport (and likely to have detailed running stats on runners) might also be on those same flights.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Its almost like they're some sort of community built around shared interest! I swear some of the people here really need to fuckin touch grass lol, especially who you're replying to.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (42 children)

Why not tell him? Who wouldn't love that?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Any person unsure about their safety sitting next to a stranger with no options for escape. I wouldn't feel particularly comfortable in such a situation.

UPDATE: I don't understand the downvotes. I have read many comments saying similar things: give this man the benefit of the doubt, not every behavior is mansplaining, you're all judgmental and jumping to harsh conclusions, and so on.

I used to be in that chorus until my wife explained to me one thing: when the cost of failure is high enough, constant vigilance and suspicion is necessary for protection and maybe even survival. And I could either accept that or not.

It felt grim and I felt disappointed by the whole conundrum, but I had to accept it as it is. From there, my view of these kinds of situations changed.

load more comments (41 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I find this hard to believe...if the guy's doing analysis, he'd surely know who she was. He'd be a big enough "fan" of running to even start doing analysis. Man, the internet is just full of BS.

Anyway, I'll pretend this was real and it's kinda funny.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Absolutely not. I've followed plans and couldn't tell you what the person looks like. It's usually not about knowing a lot about the person but the popularity of the plan. And I've come across hers so at least in my opinion, it's a common one. I find this no different than the countless stories Tony Hawk says that border the same concept. He just gets believed a lot more easily for whatever reason.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Idk, I’d believe it. I’ve been involved in a few sports to the point that I’m doing deep diving into elites trainings out of curiousity. For some athletes, the only picture I would see is a small thumbnail profile pic that was basically indecipherable, or they would be in athletic gear with hats and such. I definitely wouldn’t recognize them on the street, and it would be a crap shoot if I’d recognize them on an airplane. The only ones that I’d have a shot at are Alex Honnold, Tommy Caldwell and Andrew Skurka.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The expression should be “I had too much heart to tell him.” A person lacking heart would have told them, gleefully.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No, "didn't have the heart" doesn't mean you don't have heart, just means you have a different kind of heart, so it works fine.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I had too many hearts to tell him. My blood pressure is through the roof.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Ahh I see.. It should be DON'T don't have a heart.

Thanks for clearing that up!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

This happens a lot in the firearms community. I get told about x, y, z guns and how they function. But I have all those guns and have trained on the less accessible. I own full auto legally but every other day I'm told I can't own one. People be dumb.

load more comments
view more: next ›