red

joined 11 months ago
MODERATOR OF
amd
[–] red 3 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

using short forms is low iq now? this take gives same energy as boomers saying "kids these days"

[–] red -1 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

tell me how Gm/r^2 dosent match acceleration, the fact that i wasted my time on low iq person like you

[–] red -3 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)

yet another brain rot reply, man i am done,

""earth will move with ". Something that's definitely something, but not m/s" you idiot i was talking about accelwration, if you need units just put in dementions of all the variables, thats trivial stuff you dont understand nlm at all.

second para is another non technical nonesense

[–] red -3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (16 children)

all that is only brain-rot statements with no technical meaning. lemme make this completly clear

mf= mass of feather mb= mass of ball me= mass of earth ae=accelaration of earth fg=force experienced by both

now in case of feather

force on earth is what? yes thats fg =G.mf.me/r^2

now thats the net force on earth, now what is newtons law? me.ae=G.mf.me/r^2

we get ae=G.mf/r^2

similarly in case of ball ae=G.mb/r^2

and accelaration of earth is clearly more in case of ball, and yes this is accelaration in non inertial frame study newtons laws of motion again if you didnt know, so your second paragraph is utter nonsense

instead of nonsense brainrot statements like 'Multiplication is associative, you can switch the masses around as you please, nowhere in the formula does it say “the greater mass” or “the smaller mass” you could just as well re-arrange the formula and come up with “earth moves with gm1/M” tell me where in equations you think i am wrong

[–] red 10 points 2 weeks ago (18 children)

the fact that you got upvoted, you clearly said force on both objects is gM and the feather or ball will move with g BUT earth will move with gM/m1 which is more in case of ball, and no its not acceleration between mases, its the force experiencec by both mases so, fg=m1.a

[–] red 0 points 3 weeks ago

it is indeed horrible, I'm pretty sure one of the biggest motivation to push for digital transactions was to track easily and tax easily

[–] red 3 points 3 weeks ago

well that i meant 24/7 electricity

[–] red 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

in what situation would you need turn by turn navigation on Linux???

[–] red 5 points 3 weeks ago

the difference is this is unified and government maintained, alipay or any payment vendor's you have to use their apps, and you can only send money to people who have accounts in their apps, here it's maintained by government no need to make any account anywhere, just direct bank to bank transfer with just phone number and QR code. and more importantly no transaction fees

[–] red 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

banking apps have upi too, even in banking apps you have to sign in with id and password and such with upi specific apps you don't even have to do that, it's just that you have more freedom here, the thing is any app can have it

view more: ‹ prev next ›