Which reporting?
stephen01king
The article didn't claim she made more money on OnlyFans than on Spotify, Lily Allen did. They just then provided the estimated revenue from both services using the numbers claimed by her. It could be that they used the wrong estimation for one or both of the revenues, but what's more likely is that Lily Allen exaggerated her example.
Or it wasn't making any kind of claim and just posting what the celebrity claimed and providing estimated revenue from both service based on what she claimed. Why are you falsely blaming this on AI for no reason?
The article didn't contradict itself since it did not make the claim that she made more money from Only Fans, the celebrity did. They just posted the estimated revenue from both services which doesn't match up with what she said. The only conclusions we can come up with is either their estimation is completely off or she was exaggerating her example.
So in your two hypothetical situation, what benefit does punishing you provide to any of the victims?
The only way I could think of is the ease of setting up a collaborative spreadsheet.
All they're seeing is western Russia and war torn Ukraine. Not really an impressive view, is it?
It just sounds sarcastic to me.
Can you suggest a few.
1 reason for me, the algorithm. I can never find a lot of new thing to discover or new people to follow on Mastodon when I first started, which makes me not use it very much even now.
Does that mean you cannot distinguish between the two?
Why? The end slices are the best ones.