this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
613 points (99.0% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2154 readers
1103 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

They seem to honestly believe that Musk will get human beings to Mars before the end of Trump's next term (under the assumption he has one).

I'm sorry. This won't happen in Trump's next term (assuming he has one). This won't happen in my lifetime. This won't happen in the lifetime of anybody currently over the age of 20.

MAYBE someone who was born today will see human beings land on Mars.

MAYBE the grandchildren of someone born today will see human beings build something semi-permanent on Mars.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Hear me out: They're planning to lose.

Promise ridiculous prosperity will happen when they win.

Lose.

No matter how successful the winner might eventually be, they can always point to the ridiculous prosperity that never happened, letting them rob their base of even enjoying the basic joy of any progress, keeping them mad, hateful, and controlled.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

I mean the technical hurdles aren't insurmountable. But we lack the political will power to put resources needed into it.

It would take 60s moon landing level of commitment for 10-15 years to do any sooner.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It's a stupid idea, and a massive waste of resources that could be used here. There are multiple articles from real scientific sites, and YouTube videos from real scientists why it's a stupid idea.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

I wasn't commenting on whether we "should" go, only that I felt we had the resources/ability to go...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago

How close would 44bn get us to Mars? I can't help think that would have been a better investment than twitter.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It's technically feasible in the bare minimum “Got there” sense. Bringing someone and getting them back. But we learned a lot by the moon exploration, and that is that we aren't ready for colonization. Living there, for a long time, let alone indefinitely, that is where the million details are still unresolved. I think that's the problem that is worth tackling. We already know we can live in space for a long time as long as there are continuous shipments of resources from Earth. We could just flood the logistics problem with money and get to mars next year if we wanted to. Other than the psychologically horrifyingly long distances involved, of course.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 35 minutes ago

I'll say that Andy Weir got most of it right on how to do manned missions to Mars.

You build a huge space station, and then use that as the ship that goes to and from Mars.

Then the actual mission on the surface lasting a month or three before the astronauts pack up and head home.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The technical hurdles are insurmountable with any technology we have today. It is impossible, period, for humans to be landed on Mars in four years. It is impossible, period, for humans to have a semi-permanent settlement on Mars in the lifetime of anybody alive.

Going to the Moon, our closest neighbour, is child's play in comparison to going to Mars. And look how well getting humans back to the moon is going…

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago

Can you expand on why you are reaching that conclusion?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 hours ago

You are mistakenly assuming the human being travelling to Mars will still be living.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Well getting humans onto Mars he could do.

But getting them back.........

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

They might not even make it there. The radiation doses that they would take on the journey are massive and likely to do heavy damage like cataracts and organ failure, especially if solar storms were to hit while they were outside the magnetosphere of either planet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Where did I ever say he would get them there alive?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

Let's fire coffins into the sky!

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 hours ago

Your parents lied to you. You're not funny.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Nope. He won't even be able to get humans onto Mars. Not in four years. Not in 20 years.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

I mean if you count bodies as humans you can just do a Mars rover style drop.

But I was of course not talking seriously because obviously there is 0 chance humans get to mars in the next decade.