this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
109 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

37747 readers
254 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

NYT gift article expires in 30 days.

https://ghostarchive.org/archive/oA7zq

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Even better is that you wouldn't need an e-bike either, as frankly the high speed ones are incredibly dangerous especially when there's good infrastructure for bicycling.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, they're incredibly dangerous. But they're still way less dangerous than cars. I'd rather be complaining about ebikes injuring people than the countless deaths caused by motor vehicles.

Ebikes will need some regulation to limit speeds, of course.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I'm lucky to live in a country where e-bikes and electric scooters and such are a bigger talking point than cars.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

At that point, wouldn't they be in the road with cars barreling down like they are on a crochrocket?