this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
139 points (96.0% liked)

Programming

16976 readers
178 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Assume mainstream adoption as used by around 7% of all github projects

Personally, I'd like to see Nim get that growth.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The most beautiful language. Why doesn’t every language have pipes?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Why doesn’t every language have pipes?

Mario's favorite character

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I find Universal Function Call Syntax a much nicer solution than pipes, although I don't think it's quite as broad.

For example, taking the example from elixir's home page:

"Elixir" |> String.graphemes() |> Enum.frequencies()

would be

"Elixir".graphemes.frequences

in something like D

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I personally find that syntax a bit confusing because it looks like it's traversing members of structs/records/objects. It also looks like the composition operator in Haskell but is read in opposite order.

I'm sure it's perfectly fine when actually working in D but it's not as obvious as pipes imo.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

You can add parenthesis if you prefer