this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
1081 points (99.0% liked)

Science Memes

10885 readers
4071 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 104 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Tell the pilot to cross into another time zone so you have an extra hour. Just make sure they don't go the wrong direction.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah going backwards will just give an integer overflow so you get essentially infinite time

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's due at 11:59pm, but we teleported forward 1 hour and skipped right over it. We now have 23h07m left!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

If you consider the Bounce Theory, you have until the universe resets and bounces back to the due date to finish.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

You're asking a scientist to do a critical calculation without making a sign error first? Lol

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just tell the pilot to fly faster and relativity should handle the rest

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, time dilation works the other way around.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

So fly very slowly?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Most academic deadlines are "anywhere on earth" in my experience.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago

My time has come

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I am a historian, who even in this scenario would be one of the least useful... But I work on history of aviation, so maybe that could work out somehow lol

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm kind of an expert in prehistoric aviation myself.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Paleontologist working on pterodactyls? 😂

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, a historian who knows a lot about flight at a time when humans did not have flight yet.

So a normal person, that was the joke lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Haha I was too slow for that one

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I'm interested in what career you have. Are you a professor of historical aviation?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Well, I am a professor at a university, which involves teaching and research (at a research focused gig, so not excessive on the teaching load). I wouldn't call myself a historian of aviation really, but a historian of technology - but my dissertation and hence first (and only) book is primarily about aviation so that would potentially cause lots of folks to think historian of aviation, but I already moved on to other topics, so aviation was not my focus really, but rather aviation's role as a technology in a particular process that is the actual thing I was focusing on (territorial expansion and colonization through aviation). So, if historian colleagues ask what I do, it's history of tech and history of the geographical region I focus on. If someone outside the profession asks, sure, history of aviation.

All that said, my long and (pejoratively speaking) academic explanation is kind of a moot point, since I am unfortunately quitting academia because I am too underpaid to guarantee my kid a secure future. So the next project I had, on the history of hydroelectric dams and their environmental impacts, will not come to fruition

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

PS.: peeked your profile after responding, and ehrmmm I am actually going into IT work, which is what I have done on the side to sustain life while being a professor. I have been divided between tech and humanities for a long time, and have mixed both in my career. Also keep my side gig doing custom 3D printing for local artists, but that's just because I enjoy it :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Very interesting. I also do 3d printing for fun hee hee. Yeah, I know a lot of people from humanities who've jumped over to tech. One of the people I know was Art but they have been in tech for over a decade now

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If you don't mind telling me, what kind of roles did they get into? I worked at a small company and was a jack of all trades, started coding then did their DevOps, managed other coders, did compliance consulting gigs, was de facto sys admin, etc. But I am trying to think of what I could do in the tech world that would also leverage my skills in the humanities, rather than something purely technical, since I have a somewhat unique combination of skills with the academic background. Also because I never specialized in any one technical role, so it would be hard to jump into a senior role for any of the technical positions I had

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

I believe they mentioned they worked help desk, QA, software programmer, and then I think possibly something in networking

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Another meme made obsolete by ChatGPT.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the abstract still need tobe correct

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

ChatGPT does very well at summarizing existing information. I haven't seen it change the meaning of some input text yet. But if generating new text, sure it's an issue then.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Presentation abstract: "I'm sorry, as an AI model I'm not able to [...]"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Summarizing a news article and a scientific article is a bit different, the later needs to give the essential information of the article with perfect accuracy and the language used in scientific literature is very precise.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I agree that anything generated by an LLM will need human verification for accuracy, but scientific abstracts are one of the few areas where LLMs can be immediately useful. I’ve played with having ChatGPT create abstracts in subjects that I’m familiar with and it’s been surprisingly good. It even respects word limits. If you have a block of text that needs to be condensed, ChatGPT can probably get you most of the way there.

For example, I had chatGPT summarize your comment in 5 words:

“Summarizing scientific articles demands precision.”

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It misses what details are important most of the time or just does a very inelegant job. Even when using gpt4 I still don’t really use it for direct rewrites when it’s something important

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago