GankTopPlz

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

im sorry, it took them 8 months to put in logging for the networking problems?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (11 children)

do not fool yourself. this place is just as strong with the group think mentality. if you want proof, look at all the defederation discourse.

 
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Does it let you use it on specific users? Some bots would be useful to put it on. I know of a few that post relevant videos automatically or aggregate game API data that would be good to add to a few subs.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

in theory, you can exclude anything that is a text post, but a lot of the content posted on sum subs that you want are self posts. like sports post games, weekly resets in games, or transcripts of twitter threads.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

facebook, twitter, and tumbler all got along without community moderation, i don't see how reddit would actually be any different. every subreddit is a glorified hashtag in the grand scheme of things.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It became a problem because it meant they were forced to bow down to advertisers instead of leaning into user funding. Discord has leaned into user funding very heavily, but I don't know of any other social media that is more funded by its users than it is by ads and is regularly used/promoted, at least in the US.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Reddit could operate without subreddit moderators. The main reason mods exist is to remove abusive users and bots, both of witch could be handled by the vote system.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Reddit requires moderators in order for the business of Reddit to function.

no they dont. they literally have a system to democratically promote or suppress posts.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

mods had unilateral control over their communities until very recently. short of doing anything illegal or breaking TOS, mods could ban whoever they wanted for any reason. what stopped this was the fact that communities would riot if mods were to ban random users they simply didn't like. look at places like /r/latestagecapitalism, /r/blackpeopletwitter, /r/witchesvepatriarchy, or /r/conservative, they will all aggressively ban users or block users from posting if they do not go through verification or disagree with the group think. and the community loves it because they're stuck in their echo chambers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Reddit hires staff to do moderation

and if your neighbor hires a lawn care service, you should be paid?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Right, but you also can't create a work agreement where one was explicitly denied. It's like mowing your neighbors lawn then asking them to pay you, but they told you they wouldn't pay you if you did it before you started. It's the same with the 3rd party app devs too. While I think reddits actions are insane and detrimental to the health of the site, they are fully in their right to deny those devs access to their API and their site as a whole.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (14 children)

and reddit has it in their TOS that no one who is a mod is an employee of reddit.

view more: next ›