ibt3321

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I spoke with Anissimov

When I asked Yiannopolous and Bokhari for comment

Very good job on contacting the most neutral and dispassionate sources as well as both sides.

The Hill, Reason, Quillette, Vox co-founder Matthew Yglesias, Harvard psychologist Steven Pinker, journalist Cathy Young [links bolded]

Very careful use of links there, can't be linking anything with an edit by Gerard.

Wugapodes’ righteous fury

The large wikipedia screenshot is extremely unhinged, in a sea of what I presume are votes saying "Oppose. He cited NYT for this claim and an opinion is not a conflict of interest"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Yes it is insurmountable. There is not enough non-english text in the world to be able to train an LLM.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

big fat fucking S

    🭋🭛🮣🮧🮢
   🭋🭛 🭲🭲🭲
  🭋🭛  🮥🮩🮤
 🭋🭛   🭲🭲🭲
🭋🭛    🮡🮦🮠

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Yeah but tankie apologism takes precedence

[–] [email protected] 42 points 4 months ago

Most of the reports are unfounded in these apps. The EFF wrote about them: https://sls.eff.org/technologies/community-surveillance-apps

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

In Photoshop the AI tool allows you to generate only a specific portion of an image. The eyes appear to be the same but the mouth is different and the ruler is slightly bent. Reverse image search shows only this post

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

May actually be AI. The original video has a different face and this is the first time I've seen this version, looks uncanny.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

Thank you, it's no tits

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is an encyclopedia, so there are no pronouns like "I", so this simplifies this issue. The remaining ones are in the third person, and if we link them to data about the person that is referred to it would solve this. A longuist doesn't necessarily need to know a language in order to analyze its grammar, and a lot of the work needed in Wikifunctions is like this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

The site itself is for contributors who want to create functions and write code for them. Examples of how it might be used in the future for articles:

  • Z11884 for articles about chemicals.
  • Z11302 for use in prose.
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

It's only on the blahaj.zone web UI. Lemmy.world has a newer version.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

This comment has a timestamp in the future. It says "in 8 hours" for me.

view more: ‹ prev next ›