this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
244 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15840 readers
644 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 68 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I am continually baffled by those kiddie diddling cryptofascist fucks being generally accepted as "the left" for purposes of public perception. I know it's working as intended, but I'm still baffled that it works. They're the Andy Warhols of our time. fedposting

[–] [email protected] 53 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Russell Brand, Zizek, Vaush, Orwell, Nathan J Robinson, the list goes eternally of almost-left cringelord creeps

[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Notice more how they're western leftists...

[–] [email protected] 35 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's so hard to find the Parentis in the rough

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago

I mean, no shit, Sherlock.

If you're born and bred in a Western liberal country, which benefits from historical colonialism and current trade exploitation ('unequal exchange'), you will act according to the hegemony's rules, and benefit from its spoils...

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Specifically Anglo-Western. It wouldn't be hard to find German or Swedish libs that would gladly join in too.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Zizek is Slovenian.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What did Nathan J Robinson do? I remember him having some of the best write-ups debunking Peterson.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

if i remember correctly he fired every that worked for him when they tried to unionize and I think had a bunch of other issues. He's also a total radlib on foreign policy

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

It wasn't that they tried to unionize, it was that they wanted to convert Current Affairs to a worker owned co-op. I'll still maintain that his writing was generally good, and the people he employed were excellent, but he was a rich kid who couldn't give up control of what he saw as "his" project. It's not even about money since I'm pretty sure the magazine lost money the entire time it was in print.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Homie spent a lot of money on clothes too

[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago

I feel kinda bad for andy warhol. Like, he was trying to make art and he did, with some interesting messages. If there was just someone to reel him in he would have probably lived longer. It's not entirely his fault the CIA made his art a weapon. It does also suck how obsessed with fame he was.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Andy Warhols

Please tell me about that don't know much about him.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

He was one of a number of artists and writers that were selected by federal programs intended to derail socialist messaging in art and literature, usually under the banner of "postmodernism" but not exclusive to it. Basically, Soviet art and literature at the time had rather clear and direct messaging that frightened the ruling class of the western world, so the idea was to subsidize and promote and artificially boost the presence of countermessages that amounted to "interpretation is so open ended for this much cooler piece that it could mean anything. Nothing matters btw. It's very smart to stop caring about sociopolitical issues and just consume art product."

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

For clarity - That period in American art wasn't 100% a CIA op, but the CIA did contribute to some university art (and literature) programs and some specific individuals and publications to give it more social standing and legitimacy. It's also one of those "Yeah they admit to it on their website they're really proud of it" conspiracies.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

A lot of what the alphabet orgnaizations do is nudging. It isn't always high profile assassinations. It's shit like promoting certain subreddits. The head mod of /r/technology was once outed as a fucking general for example.

Another recent example is all of the "advisory" nudging in capeshit where the US military gets to command how the capeshit plays out.