this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
24 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37603 readers
539 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

From what I've gathered, it was just AI to clean up a track that was previously too poorly recorded to release.

It's not synthesised, it's just repaired.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interesting, I wonder why this couldn’t be accomplished with conventional techniques. I own a handful of “AI” Plugins meant to achieve similar cleanup and I feel like it always needs to be tweaked to sound right. And that’s for a guy like me without practiced mixing ears. I wonder why real studio engineers needed AI.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It was likely a combination of AI and manual tuning, like with modern photoshop plugins.

AI in this usecase is another tool for the engineer.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah. From what I understand, Giles Martin used the same technique (or, at least, a similar one) when making the 2022 remix of Revolver. The AI was able to make clean stems from the original tracks where the instruments were mixed. So, I would suspect that this technique was able to separate the vocal from tape hiss, room noise and other factors--it isn't a deepfake of John Lennon.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Hey! You can also post this to [email protected] if you fancy :)

Beatles

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Beatles link doesn't work for me. It looks broken. No http:// in it. Why email?

You can post it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's how Lemmy community addresses are formatted, it isn't email. The part after the @ symbol is the specific Lemmy instance that hosts the community.

Try copying and pasting the whole address (including the "!" at the start) into the search bar on the Lemmy instance that you use and you should be able to find that Beetles community after a few seconds!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Arhhh. The bit after the ! the android app is treating as an email. And I can't select the text. Future releases..

You're welcomed to post it though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If you click on the 3 dots to the bottom right of the comment then select "view source" you should be able to select the text.

I'm not that phased about it getting crossposted personally, just wanted to give you a hand in figuring out how Lemmy (and Jerboa) work!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

That’s pretty amazing. I’m excited to hear the song

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I can't imagine thinking so much of yourself that you need to use AI to release a new song in this manner. It's wild.

load more comments
view more: next ›