this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
37 points (100.0% liked)

Dallas-Fort Worth

555 readers
4 users here now

DFW is a home for discussion and content related to the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex. We strive to be a friendly and welcoming community to all of our users whether they are longtime residents of DFW, newcomers, curious Lemmers, or just visiting. Howdy y'all.

Don't miss : c/Texas

Sister City Communities:

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

At a stated $330,000 per mile, there are almost assuredly better measures than this dollar for dollar in most places. This makes sense in a city as comically car-dependent as Dallas and in such a hot climate, but realistically, that $330,000 could be better spent elsewhere toward fighting temperatures if a city actually wanted to do something about city temperatures and global warming as a whole.

It's just that those things would involve actually improving the city to the detriment of NIMBY drivers.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Heck, even green spaces lower overall temperatures.