this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
37 points (100.0% liked)

Dallas-Fort Worth

546 readers
27 users here now

DFW is a home for discussion and content related to the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex. We strive to be a friendly and welcoming community to all of our users whether they are longtime residents of DFW, newcomers, curious Lemmers, or just visiting. Howdy y'all.

Don't miss : c/Texas

Sister City Communities:

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (3 children)

US urban designers continue to burn mountains of money doing literally anything to marginally offset the problems caused by car dependency except creating better cities that aren't dependent on cars. More at 11.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 weeks ago

At least they're not completely ignoring the problem I guess, but it would be nice for them to take a more holistic approach to transport design. Currently it's patently obvious that considerations are barely made for anything beyond single person passenger transport.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

while this is completely true in a lot of places, i also have never heard of this specific technology, which could help the ever increasing heat problem elsewhere if used in combination with sane urban planning, especially other improvements in regards to heat.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

At a stated $330,000 per mile, there are almost assuredly better measures than this dollar for dollar in most places. This makes sense in a city as comically car-dependent as Dallas and in such a hot climate, but realistically, that $330,000 could be better spent elsewhere toward fighting temperatures if a city actually wanted to do something about city temperatures and global warming as a whole.

It's just that those things would involve actually improving the city to the detriment of NIMBY drivers.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 weeks ago

Heck, even green spaces lower overall temperatures.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago

Turning current cities into non-car cities is a decades long process. These things solve immediate problems.

Apples to oranges. Unless you rather have people suffer until the cities are fixed.