Image is of General Abdourahamane Tiani, leader of Niger (left) and Ibrahim Traoré, leader of Burkina Faso (right).
The Alliance of Sahel States (ASS) formed on September 16th in the wake of the coup in Niger in late July, in which Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso created a military and increasingly economic alliance in which attacking one would result in the other two joining. This was initially most relevant militarily, as ECOWAS was threatening an invasion of Niger if they did not restore civilian rule. Nonetheless, due to a mixture of a lack of real strength in ECOWAS due to Nigeria's internal problems, and the influence of Algeria, a very strong regional military power who negotiated against a war which could further destabilise an already destabilised region, and the vague promises of future civilian rule, the external military threat seems to have mostly dissipated.
However, internal threats remain. Burkina Faso is fighting against ISIS and al-Qaeda, which commit regular massacres of civilians; the government controls only 60% of the country. In Mali, the government is fighting against similar groups as well as the Tuareg, which inhabit the more sparsely populated north of the country - the government is in the process of kicking out the UN mission to Mali, and in the process retaking rebel stronghold cities like Kidal, which is raising some eyebrows as to what exactly the UN was doing all this time; and Niger is fighting against similar Islamic groups too, and is kicking out the French for being exploitative motherfuckers. Combine this with the sanctions against Niger which are crippling the country, disease outbreaks in Burkina Faso, and just the general shitty state of the world economy, and the situation is not looking very good currently.
That all being said, economy and trade ministers from all three countries have met this past weekend in Bamako, the capital of Mali. There, they recommended that the countries: improve the free movement of people inside the ASS (don't laugh!); construct and strengthen infrastructure like dams and roads; construct a food safety system; establish a stabilization fund and investment bank; and even create a common airline. This is all attracting foreign attention too - Russia has signed a deal to build Africa's largest gold refinery in Mali, and China is the second largest investor into Niger after France, ploughing money into the gold and uranium industries there. And, of course, the Wagner group is in the region - though I'm unsure if they're having a major or minor impact on events there.
The weekly update is here on the website.
Your Monday Briefing is here in the comments and here on the website.
Your Tuesday Briefing is here in the comments and here on the website.
Your Wednesday Briefing is here in the comments and here on the website.
Your Thursday Briefing is here in the comments and here on the website.
The Country of the Week is Burkina Faso! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.
Israel-Palestine Conflict
Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:
UNRWA daily-ish reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.
English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news (and has automated posting when the person running it goes to sleep).
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.
English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.
Various sources that are covering the Ukraine conflict are also covering the one in Palestine, like Rybar.
Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict
Sources:
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches. Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:
Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.
No comment
I feel like in a couple decades it will be released that all the civilians where killed by the idf.
Considering that the only israeli civilians are children I suspect you are correct on that.
Furthermore, even assuming the liberal definition of civilian that doesn’t account for settler status: it is completely acceptable in the eyes of international law to shoot a civilian who takes up arms against and in doing so becomes a combatant.
Don’t many settlers own guns? I have a feeling quite a few bubbas realized they aren’t as tacticool as they thought they were
I'm pretty sure it's a matter of whether they are acting as a combatant in the particular context, not just whether they happen to own a gun.
Like, the Goldstone Report even talks about this regarding Hamas militants: there were no instances found of them trying to just put on civilian clothing to blend into Palestinian crowds and camouflage/shield themselves from reprisal after e.g. launching rockets at Israel...yet a lot of the time they walk around in civilian clothes as part of their everyday lives, and that's different and okay.
Anyway, I think it's more to the point that it's likely the Palestinian freedom fighters at least mostly targeted actual Israeli combatants, since that and taking hostages were their explicit goals, and that most of the "collateral damage" is likely to be due to Israeli police and military shooting indiscriminately and not caring whether they killed other Israelis. But I also wouldn't be surprised if there were some cases of enraged Palestinian freedom fighters killing "non-combatant" settlers (and nor do I think it is very condemnable of people as oppressed as they are to lash out at their oppressors, much as Norman Finklestein has stated, and as people here generally agree are not usefully classified as "innocent"—like liberals want to do—when they actively occupy stolen homes and help in other contexts to violently steal and keep them).
Feral zionists with guns taking combat positions, clearly combatants. Had it coming either way for being at the forefront of the occupation, but that’s not the point.
Clothes are irrelevant, if somebody shoots at you they become a combatant. I’m not sure if menacing counts, but probably.
Uniforms can take be as simple as an armband or headband, Hamas has uniforms and wears them. I’m not an expert on the different ones or what they mean though. Other than the red headband being Marxists.
I agree with all of that. The clothing thing was to point out that the U.N.—applying the principles of that international law being discussed (not that it's all that legitimate a thing, being completely framed by literal political philosophy)—distinguished between contexts in terms of when it was okay or would've been illegal for Hamas militants to wear civilian clothes and "blend in". It would be illegal if they fired a rocket and then stashed their uniforms and ran into a crowd, but it's legal when they get up in the morning and go to get breakfast and do their shopping.
This was to point out that simply "owning a gun" isn't likely going to qualify a settler as a combatant in terms of the international law definition. Sure, if they pulled it out to attack Palestinians as the latter were escaping their prison or even attacking, it doesn't seem that even liberal institutions would be likely to argue against the Israelis being considered combatants in the context. That (to the extent anyone even cares about the distinctions for more than propaganda points at the moment) would be why they lie and omit and prevent investigations and shit.
And, again, I think these international law distinctions are pretty academic and of extremely limited usefulness anyway when we have much better tools to analyze situations with a leftist/anti-colonialist/anti-oppression lens.
My bad, I missed the point on that initially. Thanks for reiterating and explaining so it got through.
I honestly thought they lived in the underground complexes and tunnels when it came time for an active war footing.
As ever, I am in complete awe of the restraint the Palestinian people show in face such barbarism.
No problem. 😀
I had that thought recently. They lowered the body count of the initial assault by Hamas from 1400 to 1200 because 200 of the bodies were Hamas and they couldn't tell because of how badly they were mangled. If those 200 were holding hostages the hostages would be just as bad and there are probably more hostages than Hamas fighters. add on to that that there were 400+ military deaths and the video and testimony that IDF helicopters were blasting anything that moves. the death toll starts getting really low.
"Hamas did nothing wrong" is gonna start getting some real traction. Someone needs to expose these news stories to Norman Finkelstein before he has another talk with Piers Morgan so he can smash that smug fucker with "Do you condem the israeli defence force?" over and over.
They were firing 30mm HE autocannons at random people on the ground. That's a lot of gun. : |
Hannibal doctrine exists, they killed the ones they could.
Yeah, if that was ever in question it's not anymore.
if Caroline Ellison was an IOF tank gunner