klieg2323

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
1
Comic Surf (lemmy.piperservers.net)
 
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The com at the time was dominated by discussion of the Prodigy cancellation, so it was a relevant topic and not being overly critical for the sake of being overly critical. It presented an opinion of the cancelation that wasnt predicting doom and gloom for the franchise like the mod line being pushed at the time.

Even if it isn't substantial, why isn't there a list of blocked domains? Or a rule about it? It could have spurred a discussion in the comments, what makes a community forum like this so special. The point is it didn't violate any community standards. Then when I tried to open a discussion about it to try and refine the rules/community standards moving forward (early days of reddit emigration) I was permabanned for starting drama.

I'm not looking for a com where everyone is super critical. I am looking for one where mods are acting as petty little tyrants banning well meaning contributors because they don't have the exact same opinion on certain things as they do.

The mods are more interested in the reddit community and it shows. It's clear Lemmy is downstream of reddit to them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The mods on startrek.website are the same ones from reddit and care little about transparency or actually hosting a star trek community that fosters open discussion. They are frequently banning users that voice opinions that don't break any rules except mod opinion.

This has been going on for some time and is the perfect use case for why decentralizing common discussion topics is a feature, not a bug, of the fediverse/lemmy

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This has been going on for some time and trying to be kept quiet by the mods/admins of that instance

1
Rock off (lemmy.piperservers.net)
 
1
Jockey Pickachu (lemmy.piperservers.net)
 
1
Gameboy style (lemmy.piperservers.net)
 
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've reached the point where I'm afraid to actually be done with Tears of the Kingdom. I suppose I actually need to so I can get Pikmin 4. I'm a longtime Pikmin fan so this feels like a fever dream actually having Nintendo do another big push on the series.

Also intermittently playing New Pokemon Snap. Shameless plus, but sub to [email protected] and see pics from my playthrough and add your own.

In the retro category, my consoles are crying in neglect. I've only been playing couch multiplayer intermittently when friends come over, usually Didddy Kong Racing on N64

1
Being a bully (lemmy.piperservers.net)
 
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Get yourself an av adapter to play on your TV when you want a bigger screen!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago
1
Sleeping in (lemmy.piperservers.net)
 
2
Monchin' outside (lemmy.piperservers.net)
 
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Gave me such anxiety. Loved all the guest actors they got to play family

1
Welcome to my lair (lemmy.piperservers.net)
 
 

A US soldier is currently in process of defecting to the DPRK. This is a developing story

1
The spot (lemmy.piperservers.net)
 

You know the one

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Screw Russia. They’re pathethic and getting a taste of their own medicine.

So will you if a nuclear war is triggered. Do you really think protecting Ukraine's sovereignty is worth burning down the world in an exchange of nuclear weapons?

1
Lazy river (lemmy.piperservers.net)
 
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Not happy about Russia invading Ukraine but also not happy about the US potentially escalating to WW3. Ukraine is not worth a nuclear Holocaust

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not arguing with someone who keeps contradicting themselves in their own comment and lacks any basic historical awareness of the cold war or 20th century at large. Let me make my point crystal clear:

Nuclear war and world war should be avoided at all costs

The US committing troops to the ground to fight for Ukrainian sovereignty will trigger WW3

A third world war between NATO and Russia will involve the use of nuclear warheads

If you'd like to refute any of these points please be prepared to bring something to back up your words. I am a historian so I'll take any primary source or peer reviewed secondary sources. Otherwise you're just blowing hot air for the purpose of stoking hate. Something I won't take any more part in.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I don't know if you're genuinely trolling or just being plain ignorant.

I'm literally comparing how weapons assistance starts small and escalates to large scale involvement based on higher level comments saying something along the lines of

Oh, it's only 3k troops. Hardly an escalation

Context is king buddy. How does that whole quote go you glossed over of mine?

Ukrainians have just as much a right to die for their country as I do not having to die for it

Paraphrasing because you didn't link to me saying that.

And the point still stands, I never said the us was trying to start a war

1
Flying type (lemmy.piperservers.net)
 
view more: ‹ prev next ›