Artist behind iconic Obama ‘Hope’ poster crafts new artwork for Harris

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/08/16/politics/kamala-harris-forward-shepard-fairey/index.html

Not left, not right

Yes, we all know the media class is awful, and this isn't anything particularly new - but the reporting around the price gouging proposal is some of the worst I have ever seen. NYT, CNN all completely blowing the proportions of what the bill does completely out of the water.

The proposal would not affect the current record high grocery prices at all - it only prevents gouging during or immediately after a national disaster. So if there were another nation wide pandemic - the proposal would come into play.

37/50 states or something like that already have similar laws on the book - and yet you have economists out here acting like this will single highhandedly tank the economy, when it isn't likely to affect anything very much in our entire lifetimes.

I feel like I'm taking crazy pills from both ends. The bill itsself is basically a nothing burger and I was really disappointed when I looked into it - the media's response to it makes zero sense except in the context of class war for class war's sake.

I kinda feel like Kamala's team are purposefully announcing policies that sound progressive but don't actually do anything on purpose. I hate this shit. I hate the media. I hate dems.

Theories

1. Its literally just because Hillary Clinton sucks so hard and people didnt want to hear that shit from her
2. Deplorables is too much of a vocabulary word, weird is a word everyone knows. So deplorable just comes off more elitist, from a woman who is already seen that way. To quote a friend I asked "I think deplorable has a negative connotation that speaks to core personhood, in a way that comes off as both mean spirited and elitist"
3. The GOP hadnt gotten unhinged enough yet, so America wasnt ready for a campaign that is dismissive of them and still expected bipartisan respect and shit, but are now because the "weird" shit is so out there all the time
4. "Weird" is simply a more effective word to describe the situation at hand
5. Deplorables would have worked fine with the young people who can vote now but couldnt in 2008.
6. Kamala and especially Walz are better representations of "not weird" than Hillary was a representation of "not deplorable".
7. "Weird" hits them harder, insults them worse, and thus makes them spiral more in a way deplorable didnt
8. Deplorable would have worked fine if it wasnt just a one off comment but a sustained campaign message (this one im thinking probably not)
9. The Vance effect, he's just that weird.
10. People who are tired of Democrats being respectful like weird a lot

chuds are testing idpol for italians as oppo. it's never been more over. absurd levels of cooked

can't believe they make you donate half a million just to have a place to sit down though

I was sure it was going to be professional genocide ghoul Shapiro. Color me surprised.

Continuing this from the thread in [email protected] Have the Democrats finally hit on a good messaging strategy in calling Trump "weird?"

Original Post by @[email protected]

Inspired by this post and the fact that I'm seeing a lot of regular libs start to coverage on "these guys are weird little freaks" as a messaging policy, which really seems to be bringing out the in the far right. It's working much better for them than all of Biden's attempts to portray Trump as some kind of existential threat to .

This is interesting, and only surprising in the sense that it is surprising to see the Democrats do something kind of effective for once. Fascists thrive on being seen as cool, powerful, and dangerous; those aesthetics are central to the brand. Every time Biden gave a big speech about how the future of democracy was on the line in the election, it played into that aesthetic. Every time CNN calls January 6 a "coup attempt," it plays into that aesthetic.

Calling these people weird little freaks with weird dumb ideas and weird creepy fixations does not play into that aesthetic. It breaks the illusion that all the freaks at the RNC wearing bandages on their ears are actually normal and represent normal people. They aren't, and they don't. This is yet another thing that the left has known for some time now, but that libs seem to maybe be catching on to: taking these idiots seriously empowers them. Actually realizing that and using it is one of the smarter things that the Dems have done in a while.

Running low on freelancing projects so I figured I'd waste my time with a little speculation. The current political zeitgeist seems to be that it's Kamala's race to lose by virtue of the abortion issue and not being Biden or Trump. Polling is only just now starting to trickle in, but assuming she's got the edge right now, how does it go wrong? Here are some scenarios:

1. She picks Josh Shapiro as her VP and loses Michigan. Shapiro might help her lock in Pennsylvania, but he also "stands out among the current field of potential running mates as being egregiously bad on Palestine," as David Klion writes for The New Republic. That might be enough to lose the support of Michigan's significant Arab-American population and hand it to Trump, which is a big deal as many of the Democratic roads to electoral victory run through Michigan.
2. Republican lawsuits gum up the ballot. While legal experts have generally dismissed the possibility that efforts to challenge Brandon's dropout and swap to Kamala, this wouldn't be the first time that such experts have been caught with their pants down on significant legal rulings. Even if these lawsuits don't go anywhere, they could depress turnout by causing confusion and enabling the spread of misinformation in swing states.
3. Trump forces J.D. Vance off the ticket and gets a VP with more rizz. Ironically, this would open the GOP up to the type of litigation from point 2, but with actual legal credence since the nomination process is complete. Might still be worth it since the dude seems to be a charisma vacuum.
4. Kamala calls someone a honkey or cracker on a hot mic and white moderates freak out. This is my just for fun, pretty much. But like, what if?

Thoughts??

https://archive.is/Djhmv

SPOILER: the article itself is not worth reading, it is classic boring, Hillary platitude with no substance

the answer is no.

(as an aside point, scahill after leaving intercept seem to have lot of pent up opinions, good for him)

I think this is live. I think this woman might actually be able to draw a clock.

WSJ: How the Bet on an 81-Year-Old Joe Biden Turned Into an Epic Miscalculation

They deprived their party of a legitimate primary contest, even though they knew.

and that from existential position of being palestinian. 30 percent of voters think israel is perpetrating genocide

Lmao, today got even funnier. Also, fuck Joe Manchin.

But just to be honest, Senator, I mean, the guy has trouble completing a single sentence.

He does.

The President at least believes that we ought to feed starving children in Gaza and get humanitarian aid there. You’ve got Republicans who don’t even want humanitarian aid to go in there. Maybe somebody would want to talk about that as well. Maybe that’s what he means. I don’t know.

fuck you

Opinions on how to get Dems to change course? Do we decide to vote Republican to stick it to the man, not vote, write in, 3rd party, or the spiciest, but without intentionally killing them (just so my handler knows I'm not for senseless violence), just to threaten and have them step down without bloodshed (probably not for the next though, but what can be done)

Or do we just watch our cuck in chief watch Jill as she makes Macron-i sounds.

Cursed shirt