this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
306 points (95.8% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4573 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 62 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Because there is absolutely nothing wrong with the son-in-law of a former President being given $2 billion with no strings attached for "real estate development", despite having absolutely no experience at all in the field and even the Saudi government realizing it's batshit stupid. This is perfectly normal and happens all the time.

It's obvious we really need to look at the actions that family members of Joe Biden took while Biden was ~~president~~ a private citizen, because he may have talked to a family member who may have received a couple of thousand dollars from a Chinese company back in 1958 or something. Because if Biden knew someone who knew someone who did business with someone who looks Asian (i mean really, aren't they all the same anyway), then he definitely needs to be impeached, deported, and sent to Gitmo. ~~___~~

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Nah that'll take too long. Look, Joey down at the shop put a bunch of child pr0n on this laptop, we're gonna just say it's Hunter Biden's and call all the news stations. Hee Heee!! It's foolproof!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why go through the effort though?

Just say "laptop", "Hunter Biden", "Child pr0n", and "Biden Crime Family" enough times and the laws of word association will ensure that eventually a few people will believe it. You don't even need actual evidence, it's all about the feelz!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Well because they’re not really good at it.