Let's be clear, SCOTUS could have issued some sort of injunction. This is on them
this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
182 points (98.4% liked)
politics
18828 readers
4594 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Part of SCOTUS endorsed ‘Project 2025’
Part of SCOTUS will rule whichever way you want for the price of an RV.
It's not the presidency or governorship. Leave the seat empty until they figure out their shit.
I don’t think that’s legal. Taxation without representation and whatnot
But the current status is not representation either.
You could make the argument, but literally they have the right to elect someone. There is no legal right to not be gerrymandered, per SCOTUS
If we're being technical, there's no legal right to no taxation without representation either.
Meanwhile Washington DC exists.
They have no senate representation because they aren’t a state. They have a house seat
Y’all hear that crunching noise?
Is it a guillotine?
Those make more of a whoosh sound
More like shing-THWUNK.
Something something superior siege weapon