this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
46 points (97.9% liked)

politics

18828 readers
5217 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

“The Russian military has been decimated. You don’t write about that. It’s been freaking decimated.”

— President Biden or Dark Brandon

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

“The Russian military has been decimated. You don’t write about that. It’s been freaking decimated.”

Ha there is no way thats a quote...

Biden: No, it's not. And by the way, I don't know why you skip over all that’s happened in the meantime. The Russian military has been decimated. You don’t write about that. It’s been freaking decimated. Number one.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Furthermore, that text in the article links to a fact-check, which says he is right.

What Biden Said: “The Russian military has been decimated. You don’t write about that. It’s been freaking decimated.”

The Facts: This is a fair assessment, according to a Reuters report on a declassified U.S. intelligence assessment provided to Congress. The intelligence determined that Russia had 360,000 active military personnel when it invaded Ukraine in February of 2022. By December of last year, 315,000 Russian troops had been either killed or injured in the war—a reduction in troop strength by 87%.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The troop losses are actually replaceable (as tragic as that may be), but the planes, tanks, artillery, armored vehicles, and anti-air missiles are not. They have lost thousands of these and literally do not have enough parts to build more.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The troops are replaceable from a military perspective, but I don't think their mothers hold the same opinion.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

They're not even really replaceable from a military perspective if you're losing experienced, trained soldiers. Replacing them requires an investment in time, effort, and money.

Of course, as I understand it, Russia just replaces the bodies and doesn't bother with the training or experience.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"Decimate" means "to reduce by one tenth," so according to that fact check Biden was vastly understating it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

I call it octodecimation

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

And whose fault is it that the that deal, the ceasefire for hostages has not been consummated? Is it Hamas or Israel or both?

Biden:  Hamas. Hamas could end this tomorrow. Hamas could say (unintelligible) and done period. And, but, and the last offer Israel made was very generous in terms of who they'd be willing to release, what they'd give in return, et cetera. Bibi is under enormous pressure on the hostages, on the hostages, and so he's prepared to do about anything to get the hostages back.

???

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I get it, Hamas is a terrorist organization and are not innocent by any means. But they're straight up murdering Palestinians and boosting the recruitment rate of Hamas. Blowing people to smithereens usually does not drive them to peaceful options. Its far beyond stopping Hamas at this point. This is nothing but wreckless hate of Palestinians and ravenous hunger for their extinction. Its plain as day.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

*reckless

What Israel is doing to Gaza right now is, in fact, extremely wreck-full!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

How has nobody corrected me on that in 20 years. Thanks lol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It seems to me what you (and Biden) are saying is that things have progressed to the point where Hamas (and by extension the Palestinian people) are unwilling to reach a peaceful solution.

If that's the case, what should Israel actually do? What terms should they offer? And what if Hamas rejects those terms? Is there a solution to this problem that actually solves anything?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago

Obviously Israel must roll over and let itself be genocided as stated in Hamas charter

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's a good interview. I highly recommend that everyone reads it in full for themselves rather than cherry-picked quotes.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's good even though it is a direct transcript, including all the times he says the wrong thing and catches himself. You can tell that he knows what he is talking about, but sometimes his mouth gets out in front of his brain.

I'd love to see Trump sit down for a similar interview with Time, along with a similar transcript, where everything that comes out of his mouth is written down, verbatim. But I don't think he has the balls for that.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I agree, clearly an intelligent man and a worthwhile read. His take on Ukraine is spot on.

A few of those nonsequitors seem to be related to battling a cold (eg, the comment on his voice) or referring to other aides who are perhaps moving through the room. TIME should do a better job with annotations in these cases, and not just the one time he mixed up Putin and Jinping.

Also, no journalist would ever pose some of these questions to Trump. Values based vs practical base? The man would think you were talking about baseball

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Agreed. I thought the bit on "values-based" and "practicals-based" alliances was interesting. Diplomacy is overwhelmingly complex and I'm glad I'm no diplomat, for my own sanity.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We could do worse than having a lil bee representing us.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

If only we listened to the bees 😔