this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
190 points (97.0% liked)

politics

18645 readers
3535 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 month ago (2 children)

U.S. Marshal on duty did not shoot to kill. FAFO

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They fired four shots at his mouth…. Sounds like shoot to kill, but because the perpetrator was disabled they didn’t continue firing.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Which is the way it should be done. Now mr Flowers is experiencing the Find Out part.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is kind of sad though. He's an "adult" in name only. He's 18.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Old enough to try carjacking in DC... probably the most law enforcement heavy city in the country....

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

And that's sad.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Hey turns out it’s possible to teach law enforcement not to pull their firearm unless they intend to shoot to kill and that you should stop shooting when there is no longer a present threat. Who woulda thunk it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Everyone even moderately competent shoots to kill. They fire most commonly at the torso until the individual is no longer a threat. Turns out that putting several bullets into someone's body commonly kills them. Only in TV shows do people shoot people in non-vital areas to disable them and only in TV shows does shooting people in the foot or shoulder not just kill people same as shooting them anywhere else.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Small correction: they shoot with the intention of stopping the threat, not with the intention to kill. Otherwise, you're completely correct

-former LEO and current firearms instructor

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

That is what I meant but stated more clearly thank you.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I predict much MUCH more of this to come, and some of it more successfully.

We're experiencing a very deliberately engineered attempted coup, in which a cabal of mutually interested parties including, at least, christian conservatives, corporations and wealthy individuals, are attempting to take advantage of a dangerously mentally ill presidential candidate and the angry and spiteful people to whom he appeals in order to effectively destroy the remaining vestiges of American democracy and implement an oligarchic autocracy (arguably that's just replacing a de facto oligarchic autocracy with an explicitly codified one, but anyway...)

Quite obviously, one of their strategies is going to be to kill, or better yet from their perspective, wait for one of the lunatic politicians angry and spiteful followers to kill, anyone of any note who might oppose them.

And I predict they're going to do quite a lot of that.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This wasn't politically motivated, the dumbass tried to carjack a Federal Marshal.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thanks for the clarification, and yes - I, to my regret, failed by not getting the entire story before posting a satisfying but ultimately off-topic rant.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

It's literally in the title.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How the fuck do you have 28 up votes for spouting unfounded bullshit without even reading the fuckin article. The 18 year black male is orchestrating a coup by carjacking a US Marshal sitting in his car outside the justices house?! This is your conspiracy theory. I only point out that theyre black because you honestly think any of the SUPER FUCKING WHITE fuckheads that stormed the capital would be able to influence or intimidate an inner city youth into being their instrument of death?!? Plus its not like he's fuckin dead, Flowers is in custody and will face charges. Fuck I have not read anything this fucking stupid since the Pizza Gate shit and r/The_Donald was banned from reddit. I am genuinely embarrassed to think we might vote for the same candidate and that there are close to 30 other idiots in your corner of stupid.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Eh.

Yes - I was wrong, and yes - that was stupid.

All in all though, I'd rather be someone who makes mistakes than a raging asshole (who likely makes at least as many mistakes anyway).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Thank you for the honest reply. Hope you have a better night than whatever made you act like such a fuckin cunt up to now🍻

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And yet you've left your original comment up and unedited. You essentially made a big, stupid mess and then when someone pointed it out went "Oh oopsie poopsie" and walked the fuck away. Clean up your shit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

A certain site is claiming this is proof her stance on guns doesn't make sense

S: worlds dangerous. We should fix guns. Y'all won't so I need bodyguards.

Bodyguards protect

Right: see you're wrong. More guns.

🤯