this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
304 points (92.9% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4594 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 160 points 10 months ago (95 children)

One guy wants to work on Civil rights, taxes, and social services.

The other guy wants to jail anyone who said mean things about him, suspend the constitution, and immediately apon being sworn in use the military to institute the insurrection act and declare martial law.

Centralists: BuT bOtH sIdEs!!!

[–] [email protected] 47 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

As someone who was centrist: you can't be centrist when one person is motivated by spite to tear it down. You aren't a centrist anymore. You're an accessory.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 10 months ago

“Literally can’t tell them apart.”

[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago

also everyone on Hexbear.net

load more comments (92 replies)
[–] [email protected] 100 points 10 months ago (31 children)

His SAVE program for Student Loans is fucking incredible. It dropped a crippling payment down to $32 a month. He may be old, but that has really helped me. I support him completely.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but why couldn't have Biden done that already!?!?!?! Guess I gotta vote 3rd party now to show how strong my moral character is so I can pat myself on the back as the world burns fake tan orange around me.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Dangling the carrot of civil rights in front of minorities just so he can get reelected.. it's sad, but it is what it is.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 10 months ago

Unfortunately, the choice we have is between the false flag of that dangling carrot and the open derision of someone calling us ‘vermin’ and thinks we need to be eradicated.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's almost like shit has to go through Congress to become a law.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago

If people VOTE it very well may happen. Biden has surprised a whole lot of people so far. Look at the student loan forgiveness - it is happening IN SPITE of the Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago (5 children)

It's not like the other guy is going to be better for their civil rights. I'd rather have the guy who doesn't keep his promises over the guy who wants me shot in the street for existing.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Dangling a carrot of civil rights vs. Dangling a carrot of internment camps. Which one gets the horse moving toward progress?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Pro-tip for more votes: Say "cease fire"

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I see this as proof that we don't really live in a democracy. Most people are anti-genocide but a politician asking for a ceasefire is a fringe position. Most people want a higher minimum wage, but it's considered a fringe position in Washington. Most people want universal healthcare, but it's considered a fringe position.

Biden clearly doesn't give a shit about winning the next election.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Obama and Biden chained the Green Party candidate to chair for simply wanting to debate with the other two parties

Biden made cannabis a campaign promise and he walked back right at the start of his presidency

Harris laughed about having consumed cannabis in college while discussing her cannabis arrests

if Trump vs Biden is all we got left we are truly fucked

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

Newsflash: you're fucked

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Dude needs to promise to legalize weed at the federal level to make up for his past bullshit. That would probably get folks out to vote. Imma vote for the old geezer anyway because I don't want to live though Trump being president again. If Trump gets office again, he'll likely never leave.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (7 children)

Given his age, we should really be hearing what Harris wants to do with her presidency if he wins as well.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (6 children)

If she's good enough for a Biden she's good enough for me.

Have you seen the other guy? He's talking about instituting martial law on day one, posting armed guards at election sites, purging the federal government, and eradicating political opponents.

The dude already trying to steal a four-year term as president even though he knew he lost the election. If he's elected, he will 100% make himself a dictator for life.

IMO, he has inspired more terrorism in the United States than Osama Bin Laden ever did.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Yes, I have seen the other guy.

Which is why I'm quite concerned that an octogenarian with an unpopular VP who floundered during the primary race and has barely been seen since may not be making it to election day 2024 and passing the torch prematurely at the 11th hour during the most important election cycle in US history.

Biden is acting like a teenager that thinks they are immortal and risking the entire country on that presumption.

We should really be having a primary to run the most capable Dem candidates against Trump. But short of that, they should at very least be adequately preparing for a possible Harris v Trump ticket and not keep pretending she doesn't exist until she's unexpectedly thrust into the spotlight again.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›