TeryVeneno

joined 1 year ago
[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Also black here ๐Ÿ‘‹๐Ÿพ

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What a lovely answer, made my day fr

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Do we have a lost lemmy users community yet?

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I think it was Bleach on adult swim at night as a kid after all the other stuff like robot chicken and aqua teen hunger force ended. Could also be DBZ though

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

As much as I agree with saying that for Naruto, hard disagree on One Piece, that is one of the best series ever made at least in my opinion. Why do you think One Piece does the same thing over and over again, the story and world have evolved so much I find that hard to believe.

[โ€“] [email protected] 32 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Thankfully, bazzite is both, the community has gotten rather large lately so support has been good.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Gonna be very blunt here, if you mean to say that that comment is "authoritatively and confidently" saying that is misinformation to "undermine another person's comment" I have to tell you are in a very small minority that interpret that comment that way. Most people whom OP is intending to reach would read that comment as having one claim, one anecdote, and one explanation.

The claim is "macos is stable", the anecdote is "months of uptime" and the explanation is "powered by UNIX". And as the main question here is whether the explanation (which I will say is presented as a fact) is said in a manner that represents authoritative blind fanboyism or a casual statement. To preface, I think it's very clear based on my past interactions as well the upvote downvote spread that it is a casual, but factually incorrect statement. OP has experienced months of uptime and stability and attributes this to macos being UNIX under the hood.

While this is a wrong assertation, shaming is the incorrect response if the goal is to correct this misinformation. Shaming does very little to change minds and often leads to people doubling down. You will have no success with this approach. You must inform positively and confidently. Approach them from a perspective, "oh they just don't know, let me help them." Rather than "oh here comes the fanboy again, need to shame this guy". The first approach has had success time and time again and builds community. I assure OP did not seek to undermine the above comment nor did they post misinformation out of blind fanboyism they merely lack knowledge and that's how nearly everyone else in this comment chain read it.

I think just in general you may have an issue with taking things at face value and being blunt, which is not an uncommon issue. I experience this problem myself and my siblings have it worse than me though we worked past it by just learning more about language and talking to people about what they really mean when they say things. Do you happen to be neurodivergent? That's the case for us anyway.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I would like to inform you why your comment's tone was problematic cause most of the issues are not word choice, it's structuring. Your comment intention may have been to be amiable, but to average person your comment reads as snarky and with an air of superiority. This is mainly because the comment it is replying to does not present a view with strong conviction or to argue, they stated something and happened to reveal another belief. They talk about their uptime with macos and happen to reveal they think macos is UNIX.

If you had say said "Oh you probably shouldn't say macos is UNIX and here's why" and then proceeded to give explicit reasons and then ended the comment, it would have ended there with many upvotes. It's the presence of the "Well, um ashkuallyyyy..." structure in your comment along with the "That's not how this works pal" that makes it rude. It's like you're shaming them for not knowing instead of seeking to inform, it's not your usage of the word pal, it's the argumentative negative stance. You could have ended with "I hope that helped you learn more pal!" And everything would have been fine. Positive vs negative. Structure matters. Anyway I hope that helped you learn more pal!

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I generally speaking like most of the other things you say on lemmy, so Iโ€™m just gonna agree to disagree and move on. Have a nice day

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

GNOME catching a devious stray there for no reason

[โ€“] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

They are working on screen reader support, there was a blog post about that 2-5 days ago I think.

view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ