64
submitted 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Meanwhile the LPC oppose the bill while the CPC would work to amend it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 43 points 4 weeks ago

What a joke politics has become. Since the 1990s "protect the children" has become a perennial excuse for absurd legislation that does nothing of the sort, and not one party has learned how to stand firm against the calumnious deceit of the people who habitually abuse it. The Liberals feel confident enough to oppose this bill only because they have their own which is almost as bad.

Strange to think that only a few generations ago Canada was known for "good government."

[-] [email protected] 15 points 4 weeks ago

Protect the children, they cry, while permitting flavoured tobacco or something else as terrible

[-] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

Tobacco is the health hazard to children and adults alike, not the flavours added to it. But that's another moral panic.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago

Flavored tobacco was literally marketed to children, to get them addicted to cigarettes from an early age. The "protect the children" arguments are often used to ban things that made no impact or even positive impact in children's lives (DnD, sexual equality). Or it's used to justify surveillance and overreach (porn bans and she verification laws)

These aren't equivalent.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

If anyone's claiming that any of these things is equivalent to another it isn't me, but marketing campaigns aimed at children (for tobacco and in general) are also something we'd be better off without.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Isn't that already illegal? As far as I remember, ad breaks during my morning cartoons were either for other shows on the network or Swiffer and laundry detergent.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It is illegal, but kids get most content online now. So, although many countries have laws on the books against ads targeting children, it doesn't mean that they don't.

Juul got in trouble for doing this, using ads that were definitely not specifically targeting tweens/teens on websites for Seventeen magazine, cartoon network, and Nick jr.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/12/health/juul-vaping-lawsuit.html

Edit: correction on the websites

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2024
64 points (97.1% liked)

Canada

6961 readers
557 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ‘’ Lifestylecoming soon


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Other


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here:

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No porn.
  4. No Ads / Spamming.


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS