Politics

268 readers

11 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1: Posts have the following requirements:
▪️ Post articles about the US only

▪️ Title must match the article headline

▪️ Recent (Past 30 Days)

▪️ No Screenshots/links to other social media sites or link shorteners

Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. One or two small paragraphs are okay.

Rule 3: Articles based on opinion (unless clearly marked and from a serious publication), misinformation or propaganda will be removed.

Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Denver gave people experiencing homelessness $1,000 a month. A year later, nearly half of participants had housing. (www.businessinsider.com)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Denver's basic income pilot — which first started payments in fall 2022 — focused on over 800 Coloradans experiencing homelessness, including people living in cars, temporary shelters, the outdoors, or other non-fixed living situations. Participants like Laws were given direct cash payments, no strings attached, and could spend the money on whatever they needed.

Denver released the project's one-year report on June 18, showing that 45% of participants secured their own house or apartment after receiving basic income for 10 months. They also experienced fewer emergency room visits, nights spent in a hospital or a temporary shelter, and jail stays. The report estimates that this reduction in public service use saved the city $589,214.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I just can't believe that when you give money to people who don't have enough they will spend it on basic necessities! Maybe we should try replicating this nationally to see if this was just an outlier.

For a control, maybe do an income for everyone. To keep is simple, we would need to stick to the basics and just give everyone the same amount and see if it provides universal stability. There is probably some kind of name that would cover this universally basic income.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This can't be right. I'm certain money is required to trickle from somewhere. You can't just give it to people!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Their motto should be "The cruelty is the point" for all the policies they push.

load more comments (1 replies)