this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
856 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

57455 readers
4601 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Copyright serves a very useful purpose. It's just been twisted into something it wasn't meant to be.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You misunderstand me. When I say, "copyright is bullshit" I don't mean that I don't like it, or that it doesn't work. I mean it's bullshit in the same way that the crystal healing or mushroom cancer therapy is bullshit.

You cannot steal an idea, it's impossible. So creating laws that punish people for doing things like copying a digital file doesn't make sense. Copyright supposedly was created to create an incentive for artists and inventors to make cool and enriching stuff.

But what it actually does is protects business savvy people and allows them to game the system, get first mover advantage over all others, and then punish any potential competitors in that space.

As if nobody was creating artwork or inventing useful devices before copyright law came into being.

Just because something is useful doesn't make it good, atomic bombs are useful, factory farming is useful.

I think the only thing people should be protected from as a creator is fraud. You can copy a person's works and modify or distribute them in any manner you see fit, as long as it's clear that you are not the original creator. You cannot claim to be them or to be affiliated with them unless you actually are.

That is what the principle of copyleft is all about. If copyright worked in principle, then you should see millions of individual creators enriched and protected by it.

But you don't see that, instead, a few giant mega corps and super wealthy tycoons own and control enormous swaths of "intellectual property" and small time creators struggle to make ends meet and are sued into oblivion by the same powerful groups.

Sure it's great for boosting wealth and GDP, but that boost does not apply to most of the population, it applies to the tiny elite that has now captures enormous segments of the market and fight tooth and nail to keep it that way.

Copyright is structurally flawed, it doesn't work because it cannot work. It's fundamentally based on a the nonsensical concept of "intellectual property" which as I said at the beginning, is bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure I misunderstood you at all.

Copy left, incieldentally, is a form of copyright.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

It only exists to counter the existing framework. In an ideal world, nobody would honor or respect the idea of "intellectual property" and hence, only fraud would be punished.

load more comments (3 replies)