this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
159 points (91.2% liked)

Technology

57435 readers
3218 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Anyone have any other good suggestions for Firefox alternatives? Sounds like I may be needing to switch soon.

[–] Blisterexe 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

why would you need to switch, did you read the article?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

AI as in machine learning? No I dont think that's bad. It's a very useful technology that we've already been using for decades in a bunch of different fields. But I'm assuming you're referring to LLMs which are what's being integrated into Firefox.

I would argue that LLMs ARE bad. For multiple reasons. At least the big ones run by these giant tech companies.

If you're locally running one with training data provided by you then I don't see an issue with that really. (except maybe energy consumption issues. Though I don't imagine a personal use LLM run locally would draw anywhere near the energy that something like Chat Gpt is drawing.)

I'm very much on the side that believes that what these LLM models do essentially boils down to theft/plagiarism though. So if you disagree with that you may disagree that LLMs are bad.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)