142
submitted 2 weeks ago by Maven to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 43 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

So, would official acts as president be legal by definition? Would there be such a thing as an official act as president that may otherwise be criminal?

And how does the ruling protect against treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors (specifically, the past part)? How is this ruling not in direct contrast to the constitution?

[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

The job of President throughout the 20th century has involved committing crimes. If they gave that away, then all of these ghouls could potentially be prosecuted.

In the future, the former President could go to jail for the next version of Iran-Contra... and we couldn't possibly allow that to happen.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

I wonder what the US would've been like if leaders were actually held accountable...

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

We wouldn't exist as the US.

load more comments (6 replies)
this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
142 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

6973 readers
308 users here now

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS