this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
536 points (93.9% liked)

Technology

58480 readers
3962 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 96 points 3 months ago (17 children)

I think it's less that it's "impossible" but rather that it's expensive.

Honestly we've in general shoved too much shit into the browser that's not strictly related to just browsing web sites.

And you "have to" support all the layers and layers and layers of added stuff, or you can't "compete".

But, at the same time, the goals of making a good-enough browser that mostly works and isn't completely enshittified and captured by corpo big tech interests is a very worthy project and 100% support what they're doing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

No, I'd have accepted too expensive as an answer. They were ready to die on the hill that no one could possibly create a new browser from specs.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Hilarious, I suppose, given the origins of Chrome and that it was a team of people sitting down to make a new browser from the specs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

My thoughts exactly.

Also nothing is stopping someone from forking an open browser and throwing money/bodies at keeping it up.

It's be a shame to lose free updates, but certainly not undoable.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Agreed. As much as I understand the urge to build your own shiny new thing, I'd pay real actual human money for someone to take Blink, and put it in a non-lobotomized, non-enshittified, non-garbage UI that has things like a self-hosted sync server, built-in adblock/noscript/etc, and the ability to use extensions for things like password managers.

But no crypto stuff, no gaming stuff, no VPN services, no browser password managers, no sponsored links, no sponsored default search engines, no email client, blah blah blah.

Browser, adblock, self-hosted sync, done.

load more comments (13 replies)