this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
87 points (98.9% liked)

retrocomputing

3972 readers
1 users here now

Discussions on vintage and retrocomputing

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 month ago (4 children)

It's not stable, but it will boot and run ... most of the time.

Pretty much my recollection of running Windows NT on x86.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

NT 3.5 wasn’t too bad.

NT4 moved a lot of stuff into the kernel that wasn’t ready for prime time and we suffered for it, at least on NT Workstation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

4.0 was my first exposure to NT - I used systems running 3.5 a few times, but not enough to have any real opinion on it. I did know there had been big architectural changes, but that was all. I have no difficulty believing 3.5 was better though.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)