this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
624 points (97.1% liked)

Science Memes

10271 readers
2432 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/1104168

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 74 points 1 month ago (18 children)

How much gravity would the Deathstar’s mass provide? I feel like it would be very small considering it has no real massive central solid or liquid core.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (16 children)

It's the size of a moon and made from metal: It's definitely generating some gravity (even a small amount of mass generates gravity) but I guess whatever tech they use to generate gravity overcomes it.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 month ago (11 children)

It's the size of a very, very small moon, and mostly hollow.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah the fact it's called a small moon is slightly deceptive to us because our moon is absolutely huge as far as moons go. The natives of the SW universe would be used to much much smaller moons.

For reference, our moon is 3475km across and the death star is 150km across, so it's diameter is 23 smaller. It's also weighed at about 900million tonnes or 9*10^14kg.

If I'm right (which I'm likely not). g=(GM)/r² or g=(6.66710^-119*10^13)/75².

That's a gravity of 1.086x10^-5m/s² or if I round with pure disrespect for physics, 100,000 times weaker than earth's gravity. Essentially it's totally negligible compared to their artificial gravity. Hell, I don't even think a marble on the floor would overcome it's own grip and roll towards the center of the space station.

My maths is almost certainly wrong somewhere here, I failed it badly.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Our moon is huge for a planet of Earth's size, but not compared to the big moons of Jupiter and Saturn.

Last time I looked it up, I used Pluto's moons as a reference because some of them are smaller than DS1, but Charon is quite a bit bigger. Based on the shapes of Pluto's moons, I think even if DS1 were solid it would still be too small to compact itself into a sphere with its own gravity.

Fun fact: Charon is even more huge relative to Pluto (just over 50% of Pluto's diameter) than Luna is compared to Earth (about 25% of Earth's diameter).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

fun fact, pluto and charon are technically a binary planet(oid), because the point they orbit is in-between them. (Charon doesn't orbit Pluto, they both circle empty space)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Pluto has more than one satellite?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Must have missed that. Cool!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

I mean, we mostly only have info on our solar system for moon sizes. We could easily be an oddball, although it's not good science to assume we're special in any way.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)