this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
133 points (99.3% liked)

collapse of the old society

903 readers
63 users here now

to discuss news and stuff of the old world dying

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (4 children)

“Is it okay for a guy named Bob to collect confidential price strategy information from all the participants in a market and then tell everybody how they should price?” she asked. “If it isn’t okay for a guy named Bob to do it, then it probably isn’t okay for an algorithm to do it either.”

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It’s a good principle but I think it /is/ legal for Bob to do that because Bob could do it without explicit agreements. They give the sensitive info to Bob (which is legal outside of San Francisco) and Bob suggests prices. Without agreements in place they simply trust that Bob’s hint will work to their benefit and they follow along on the basis of trust rather than agreement.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Dude. If you have any impact on pricing, you need to revisit your company’s pricing training or talk to a lawyer.

You could realistically end up in jail.

At least read the Sherman antitrust act.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

This is what we find in the Sherman act link you supplied:

A Section 1 violation has three elements:

(1) an agreement;
(2) which unreasonably restrains competition; and
(3) which affects interstate commerce.

(emphasis mine)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

People go to jail under Sherman without a written agreement.

Don’t go to jail for your boss’s bonus.

load more comments (2 replies)