this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

Death to NATO

1551 readers
10 users here now

For posting news about NATO's wars in Ukraine, Serbia, Kosovo, and The Middle East, including anywhere else NATO is currently engaged in hostile actions. As well as anything that relates to it.

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (90 children)

Actions are more important than words. The U.S. is going out of its way to expedite the artillery needed to continue Israel's indiscriminate bombing of civillians in its ongoing genocidal campaign against Palestinians.

Please I am begging you do not take these organizations at face value- read what the poster above you sent and recognize the distance between the statement "You need to comply with international law more closely" and the action: here is a way for us to get you bombs for you to use more quickly.

If on one hand part of the state apparatus is signaling for "restraint" but the state is accelerating its ability to provide weapons that its calling for restraint in use of the actual stance is clear: what you're doing is fine by the state.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (89 children)

It's alright, we can agree to disagree. Biden has criticized the Netanyahu government for their treatment of Palestinians. More should be done to ensure their safety, hence the conditial provisions of arms, but the United States policy stance has clear ambitions for a 2 state solution. Neither Hamas, nor the Netantahu government are okay with this, however it remains the United States ambition. I truly hope we can see this conflict resolved in my lifetime.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

You still haven't been able to back up your claim that the USA is putting the breaks on it's aid of Isreal because of the genocide. All you've done is point to the US going "we'd like it if you slowed down on the genocide, but we'll 100 support you if you don't" and tried to equivocate that as being the same, when it really isn't.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I said pumping the breaks. There's still legitimate concern for the removal of Hamas as the acting government of Gaza. Neither Hamas, nor the Netantahu backed Israeli government want a 2 state solution, however this remains the US states policy. Whoever can broker a deal that affirms a 2 state solution here will hopefully produce meaningful change towards this conflict.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I said pumping the breaks

Doesn't change anything about my point.

There's still legitimate concern for the removal of Hamas as the acting government of Gaza

Incorrect. And you don't see the USA sending endless, unconditional, military aid to Palestine so they can remove the Israeli government.

Neither Hamas, nor the Netantahu backed Israeli government want a 2 state solution

Hamas explicitly calls for a 2 state solution you lying ghoul.

this remains the US states policy

Not true, not until the US recognises the state of Palestine.

Whoever can broker a deal that affirms a 2 state solution here will hopefully produce meaningful change towards this conflict.

Going to be pretty hard to do while Isreal and the USA are committed to genocide.

load more comments (86 replies)
load more comments (86 replies)