this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
1287 points (97.1% liked)

Memes

45290 readers
1319 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 weeks ago (73 children)

The problem is that landlords don't create value, they seek to endlessly profit off of one time labor. Rent-seeking creates no real Value of any substance.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 weeks ago (39 children)

If they don’t create value then they wouldn’t exist in a capitalist market. Their value is that they take the liability of homeownership.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Capitalism optimizes for exchange value not use value, also landlordism is a fuedal holdover that hurts capitalism, I would suggest reading the chapters in capital volume 3 on land rent

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I agree I think they should probably be taxed accordingly. My comment was more just a face value judgement that they do exist and they are of value because people do rent houses.

I’m also not really sure what a viable alternative is in a free market.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I’m also not really sure what a viable alternative is in a free market.

https://youtu.be/Hcl3R-yARX8?si=H44MrRjaNH0ob8Bx

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How is a 30 minute video about the Soviet economy a valid answer to alternatives to landlordism in a capitalist market? At least give me a timestamp where they speak to this point.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The viable alternative is to get rid of the "free"market

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (36 replies)
load more comments (69 replies)